Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188294›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comparative study of deterministic and stochastic computational modeling approaches for analyzing and optimizing COVID-19 control.

Abdeldjalil Kadri, Ahmed Boudaoui, Saif Ullah, Mohammed Asiri, Abdul Baseer Saqib, Muhammad Bilal Riaz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdeldjalil KadriLaboratory of Mathematics Modeling and Applications, University of Adrar, Adrar, Algeria.
Ahmed BoudaouiLaboratory of Mathematics Modeling and Applications, University of Adrar, Adrar, Algeria.
Saif UllahDepartment of Mathematics, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, KP, 25000, Pakistan.
Mohammed AsiriDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abdul Baseer SaqibFaculty of Education, Nangrahar University, Nangrahar, Afghanistan. ab_saqib@nu.edu.af.
Muhammad Bilal RiazIT4Innovations, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of deterministic and stochastic computational modeling approaches for the optimal control of COVID-19. We formulate a compartmental epidemic model with perturbation by white noise that incorporates various factors influencing disease transmission. By incorporating stochastic effects, the model accounts for uncertainties inherent in real-world epidemic data. We establish the mathematical properties of the model, such as well-posedness and the existence of stationary distributions, which are crucial for understanding long-term epidemic dynamics. Moreover, the study presents an optimal control strategies to mitigate the epidemic's impact, both in deterministic and stochastic sceneries. Reported data from Algeria are used to parameterize the model, ensuring its relevance and applicability to practical satiation. Through numerical simulations, the study provides insights into the effectiveness of different control measures in managing COVID-19 outbreaks. This research contributes to advancing our understanding of epidemic dynamics and informs decision-making processes for epidemic controlling interventions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Computer SimulationHumansSARS-CoV-2Stochastic ProcessesCOVID-19 stochastic modelingExtinctionSimulationStationary distributionStochastic optimized control

Identifiers

PMID40188294
PMCPMC11972319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.