ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning of clinical phenotypes facilitates autism screening and identifies novel subgroups with distinct transcriptomic profiles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral blood mononuclear cell proteomic profiling reveals cytoskeletal- and chromatin-associated protein signatures in autism spectrum disorder.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- A Critical Synthesis of Machine Learning in Autism Spectrum Disorder Genomic Research: From Transcriptomics to Microbiome.Medeniyet medical journal · 2026Article
- Organoid intelligence: a promising paradigm for autism spectrum disorder research.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Review
- Prenatal bisphenol A exposure perturbs sex-dependent transcriptomic regionalization of autism-associated genes in the developing brain.Biology direct · 2026Article
- Applying artificial intelligence in neurodevelopmental disorders management and research.European journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Diagnostic classification of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder based on brain functional network characteristics of the dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmark model.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The role of machine learning in autism spectrum disorder assessment and management.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Predicting autism spectrum disorder severity in children based on specific language milestones: a random forest model approach.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- Statistical Methods for Multi-Omics Analysis in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: From High Dimensionality to Mechanistic Insight.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A disrupts RNA splicing in the prefrontal cortex and promotes behaviors related to autism in offspring.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) presents significant challenges in diagnosis and intervention due to its diverse clinical manifestations and underlying biological complexity. This study explored machine learning approaches to enhance ASD screening accuracy and identify meaningful subtypes using clinical assessments from AGRE database integrated with molecular data from GSE15402. Analysis of ADI-R scores from a large cohort of 2794 individuals demonstrated that deep learning models could achieve exceptional screening accuracy of 95.23% (CI 94.32–95.99%). Notably, comparable performance was maintained using a streamlined set of just 27 ADI-R sub-items, suggesting potential for more efficient diagnostic tools. Clustering analyses revealed three distinct subgroups identifiable through both clinical symptoms and gene expression patterns. When ASD were grouped based on clinical features, stronger associations emerged between symptoms and underlying molecular profiles compared to grouping based on gene expression alone. These findings suggest that starting with detailed clinical observations may be more effective for identifying biologically meaningful ASD subtypes than beginning with molecular data. This integrated approach combining clinical and molecular data through machine learning offers promising directions for developing more precise screening methods and personalized intervention strategies for individuals with ASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.