ArticleScientific reports2025
Time-warping analysis for biological signals: methodology and application.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Timing Matter? Exploring the Effects of Measurement Error on Models.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Article
- Peak Persistence Diagrams for Shape-Based Signal Estimation.IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Any set of biological signals has variability, both in the temporal and spatial domains. To extract characteristic features of the ensemble, these spatiotemporal profiles are typically summarized by their mean and variance, often requiring prior padding or resampling of the data to equalize signal length. Such compression can conceal essential information in the signal. This work presents the method of time-warping, reformulated as elastic functional data analysis (EFDA), in an accessible way. This powerful approach rescales the temporal evolution of signals, aligns them accurately, decouples their spatial and temporal variability, and faithfully extracts their characteristics. This technique was compared to conventional methods of normalizing or padding data followed by averaging, using synthetized signals with controlled variability and real human data from a complex manipulation task. Comparative analysis demonstrates that EFDA successfully reveals otherwise concealed features and teases apart temporal and spatial variability. Critical advances to the more common method of dynamic time-warping (DTW) are discussed. Application of EFDA and potential new insights are illustrated in the context of human motor neuroscience. Annotated code to facilitate the use of this technique is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.