Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188219›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025

Identifying high-risk groups for self-harm in adolescents using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): a cross-cohort comparison latent class analysis study.

David McEvoy, Ross Brannigan, Colm Healy, David Mongan, Mary Clarke

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David McEvoySchool of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland (RCSI), Beaux Lane House, Mercer Street Lower, Dublin 2, Ireland. davidmcevoy@rcsi.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8230-8727
Ross BranniganSchool of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland (RCSI), Beaux Lane House, Mercer Street Lower, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3844-0250
Colm HealyDivision of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-1861
David MonganCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7931-9636
Mary ClarkeSchool of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland (RCSI), Beaux Lane House, Mercer Street Lower, Dublin 2, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5155-9400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young people who self-harm are at an increased risk of suicide. Furthering our understanding of the risk factors for self-harm is essential for identifying high-risk groups, which can be used to inform the design of preventative interventions. This study used the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and applied latent class analysis to the risk factors for self-harm at ages 13 and 17. Longitudinal associations between the latent classes and self-harm at ages 17 and 20 were examined. Cross-cohort comparisons were conducted between this study and a previous study using Irish data. At age 13 there was a low risk group, a peer problems group, and substance use group, similar for the two cohort studies, and a family conflict group, which was the least similar group to its matching group in the Irish study. All of these age 13 high-risk groups had approximately twice the relative risk (between 1.3 and 2.5) for self-harm at age 17 compared to the low risk group. The age 17 models were very similar across the two cohorts, each with a low risk group, a depression and high substance use group, a depression and low substance use group, and a substance use group. The relative risk of self-harm at age 20 for these high-risk groups compared the low risk group ranged from 3.6 to 8.0. These groups could help identify those at risk of self-harm and inform the design of prevention programmes to reduce self-harm behaviour in young people.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisLongitudinal StudiesMalePeer GroupRisk FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultAdolescentsALSPACSelf-harmSelf-injurySub-groupsYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID40188219
PMCPMC12507929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.