ReviewPediatric research2025
Neuroprognostication in neonatal encephalopathy due to presumed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
Review in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of adverse outcome in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy treated with therapeutic hypothermia: a real-world cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Whole-body vs. selective head cooling and target temperature strategies for neonatal HIE: a meta-analysis of long-term outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Child and Parent Perspectives on Daily Functioning after Perinatal Brain Injury.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Predicting cerebral palsy and 18-month neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with presumed hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: role of general movements assessment and early neurological examination.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last two decades, significant progress has been made in the management of neonatal encephalopathy due to presumed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. One key area that requires improvement is timely and accurate neuroprognostication in this population to identify infants who may benefit from early interventions and harness the maximum neuroplastic capacity of the developing brain. Improved neuroprognostication also has the potential to foster more effective communication of findings to caregivers. In this review, we explore whether improved neuroprognostication is possible by assessing clinical, biochemical, electrographic, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging biomarkers and their role in neuroprognostication. IMPACT STATEMENT: Over the last two decades, significant progress has been made in the management of neonatal encephalopathy due to presumed hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. One key area that requires improvement is timely and accurate neuroprognostication in this population to identify infants who may benefit from early interventions and harness the maximum neuroplastic capacity of the developing brain. In this review article, we discuss general concepts and principles of neuroprognostication and the role of each prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40188218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.