ArticleCommunications biology2025
Direct comparisons of neural activity during placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia between humans and rats.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia can profoundly alter pain perception, offering critical implications for pain management. While animal models are increasingly used to explore the underlying mechanisms of these phenomena, it remains unclear whether animals experience placebo and nocebo effects in a manner comparable to humans or whether the associated neurobiological pathways are conserved across species. In this study, we introduce a novel framework for comparing brain activity between humans and rodents during placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia. Using c-Fos immunohistochemistry in rats and fMRI in humans, we examined neural activity in 70 pain-related brain regions, identifying both conserved and species-specific connectivity changes. Functional connectivity analysis, refined by pruning connections based on known anatomical pathways, revealed significant overlap in key regions, including the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, and nucleus accumbens, highlighting conserved circuits driving placebo and nocebo responses. This cross-species methodology offers a powerful new approach for investigating the neurobiology of pain modulation, bridging the gap between animal models and human studies. Identifying these common connections validates the use of animal models and enables preclinical researchers to focus on circuits that are conserved across species, ensuring greater translational relevance when developing new and effective treatments for pain conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.