Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188155›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction of methane hydrate equilibrium in saline water solutions based on support vector machine and decision tree techniques.

Chou-Yi Hsu, Jorge Sebastian Buñay Guaman, Amit Ved, Anupam Yadav, G Ezhilarasan, A Rameshbabu, Ahmad Alkhayyat, Damanjeet Aulakh, Satish Choudhury, S K Sunori and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chou-Yi HsuThunderbird School of Global Management, Arizona State University Tempe Campus, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Jorge Sebastian Buñay GuamanFacultad de mecánica. Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Riobamba, 060106, Ecuador.
Amit VedDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi University Research Center, Marwadi University, Rajkot, 360003, Gujarat, India.
Anupam YadavDepartment of Computer engineering and Application, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India.
G EzhilarasanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
A RameshbabuDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ahmad AlkhayyatDepartment of computers Techniques engineering, College of technical engineering, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Damanjeet AulakhCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India.
Satish ChoudhuryDepartment of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, 751030, Odisha, India.
S K SunoriGraphic Era Hill University, Bhimtal, Uttarakhand, India.
Fereydoon RanjbarDepartment of Chemistry, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch, Isfehan, Iran. fereydoonranjbar1990@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of clathrate hydrates offers a powerful approach for separating gaseous substances, desalinating seawater, and energy storage at low temperatures. On the other hand, this phenomenon may lead to practical challenges, including the blockage of pipelines, in some industries. Consequently, accurately predicting the equilibrium conditions for clathrate hydrate formation is crucial. This study was undertaken to design reliable models capable of predicting the equilibrium state of methane hydrates in saline water solutions. A comprehensive collection of measured data, consisting of 1051 samples, was assembled from published sources. The prepared databank encompassed the hydrate formation temperature of methane (HFTM) in the presence of 26 different saline water solutions. A machine learning modeling was undertaken through the implementation of Decision Tree (DT) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) approaches. While both models had excellent performance, the latter achieved higher accuracy in estimating the HFTM with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.26%, and standard deviation (SD) of 0.78% in the validation process. Furthermore, more than 90% of the values predicted by the novel models fell within the [Formula: see text]1% error bound. It was found that the intelligent models also favorably describe the physical variations of HFTM with operational factors. An examination using the William's plot acknowledged the truthfulness of the gathered data and the suggested estimation techniques. Ultimately, the order of significance of the factors governing the HFTM was clarified using a sensitivity analysis.

Indexed as

Hydrate formation temperatureIntelligent modelingMethaneSaline water solutions

Identifiers

PMID40188155
PMCPMC11972364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.