ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of methane hydrate equilibrium in saline water solutions based on support vector machine and decision tree techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The formation of clathrate hydrates offers a powerful approach for separating gaseous substances, desalinating seawater, and energy storage at low temperatures. On the other hand, this phenomenon may lead to practical challenges, including the blockage of pipelines, in some industries. Consequently, accurately predicting the equilibrium conditions for clathrate hydrate formation is crucial. This study was undertaken to design reliable models capable of predicting the equilibrium state of methane hydrates in saline water solutions. A comprehensive collection of measured data, consisting of 1051 samples, was assembled from published sources. The prepared databank encompassed the hydrate formation temperature of methane (HFTM) in the presence of 26 different saline water solutions. A machine learning modeling was undertaken through the implementation of Decision Tree (DT) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) approaches. While both models had excellent performance, the latter achieved higher accuracy in estimating the HFTM with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.26%, and standard deviation (SD) of 0.78% in the validation process. Furthermore, more than 90% of the values predicted by the novel models fell within the [Formula: see text]1% error bound. It was found that the intelligent models also favorably describe the physical variations of HFTM with operational factors. An examination using the William's plot acknowledged the truthfulness of the gathered data and the suggested estimation techniques. Ultimately, the order of significance of the factors governing the HFTM was clarified using a sensitivity analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.