ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2025
An analysis of the value-added of antibiogram subgroup stratification.
Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStratified antibiograms are recommended to guide empiric clinical treatment. However, which strata to focus on, the limited number of isolates in identified strata, and the heavy associated workload all pose challenges. This study compares differences in antibiotic susceptibility between a hospital-wide, all-specimens antibiogram and stratified antibiograms in order to identify the value-added of antibiogram stratification.
methodAntibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 2021 at a quaternary-care academic hospital was obtained from published hospital-wide and unit- and specimen-specific stratified antibiograms. Differences in percent susceptibility by organism and drug between the hospital-wide and stratified antibiograms were calculated. Weighted averages of the difference in percent susceptibility were calculated for each stratified antibiogram compared to the hospital-wide antibiogram and unit-wide antibiograms. Differences were shown through heat maps.
resultsWhen compared to a hospital-wide, all-specimens antibiogram, the emergency department (ED) antibiogram showed higher susceptibility, whereas the intensive care unit (ICU) and, particularly, the transplant unit antibiograms exhibited reduced susceptibility. Compared to unit level antibiograms, further stratification within each unit to specimen-specific (syndromic) antibiograms revealed additional differences. In the ED, urine and respiratory-stratified antibiograms had lower susceptibility and blood had higher susceptibility. Compared to unit-specific antibiograms, in the ICU, all specimen-stratified antibiograms had lower susceptibility and in the transplant unit, antibiograms for all specimens but urine had lower susceptibility.
conclusionUsing a hospital-wide all-specimens antibiogram may both overcall and under call susceptibility leading to poor empiric antimicrobial choices. Specimen-specific antibiograms stratified by unit best inform empiric therapy for specific populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.