Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188098›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2025

Experiences of participants with undiagnosed diseases and hereditary cancers during the initial phase of the Hong Kong genome project: a mixed-methods study.

Annie Tw Chu, Samuel Yc Sze, Desiree Ms Tse, Cheryl Wy Lai, Carmen S Ng, Coco Ws Yu, Pui-Hong Chung, Fei-Chau Pang, Brian Hy Chung, Su-Vui Lo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Annie Tw Chu *Hong Kong Genome Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0009-0004-8147-2890
Samuel Yc Sze *School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8089-5312
Desiree Ms Tse *Hong Kong Genome Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6874-9507
Cheryl Wy LaiSchool of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0009-0007-7043-1235
Carmen S NgSchool of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4219-3907
Coco Ws YuSchool of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0009-0002-9641-0831
Pui-Hong ChungSchool of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Fei-Chau PangHealth Bureau, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6970-7651
Brian Hy ChungHong Kong Genome Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China. bhychung@hku.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-5916
Su-Vui LoHong Kong Genome Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China. losv@genomics.org.hk.
Jianchao QuanSchool of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. jquan@hku.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-8386-8512

Funding

Health and Medical Research Fund HKGP-HKU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hong Kong Genome Project (HKGP) is the first population-wide whole genome sequencing (WGS) programme in Hong Kong and aimed to integrate genomic medicine into the healthcare system. Implementing genetic counselling is essential to help participants understand the genetic basis of diseases and guide informed decision making. We assessed participant experiences during the initial HKGP pilot phase that enrolled patients with undiagnosed diseases and hereditary cancers.

methodsParticipants were recruited from three partnering centres at public hospitals during June-September 2023. Participant surveys covered four domains: (1) overall satisfaction, (2) informed consent process, (3) genetic counselling, and (4) attitude towards HKGP. Associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Qualitative feedback was collected in focus group interviews.

resultsAmong 422 eligible participants, 341 completed the survey (80.8% response) and five focus group interviews were held (21 participants). We found 89.8% [95% CI: 86.1-92.7] were satisfied with their HKGP experience. Almost all felt that HKGP participation could benefit others (86.8% [95% CI: 82.7-90.0]) and advance genomic research in Hong Kong (88.9% [95% CI: 85.0-91.9]). The survey item with the lowest agreement among respondents was feeling that HKGP participation could improve their/child's medical treatment (73.5% [95% CI: 68.5-78.0]). Those with secondary and tertiary education were less likely to agree genetic counselling was helpful (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.02 [95% CI: 0.001-0.41]; 0.02 [0.001-0.51]), or the appropriate length of time (OR: 0.12 [95% CI: 0.014-0.81]; 0.11 [0.01-0.91]). Focus group participants cited helping scientific advances and shortening the diagnostic odyssey of future patients as key reasons for participation. Participants hoped for a shorter reporting time of WGS results, additional medical follow-up, and allowing referral of relatives.

conclusionsParticipants were overall highly satisfied with the HKGP and genetic counselling experience. Satisfaction levels were comparable to overseas genomic programmes and locally provided healthcare services. Participants' major concerns on WGS reporting time could be addressed by strengthening the informed consent process to ensure their expectations align with project implementation. Emphasizing the long-term value of genomic research and its potential for personalized treatments may increase participant engagement.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsUndiagnosed DiseasesAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWhole Genome SequencingChinaGenomeHereditary cancerPatient experienceProgram evaluationRare diseasesSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40188098
PMCPMC11972539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.