ArticleHuman genomics2025
Experiences of participants with undiagnosed diseases and hereditary cancers during the initial phase of the Hong Kong genome project: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patients offered genomic testing for rare disease and cancer: a real-world evaluation of impact and processes of care.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Hong Kong Genome Project (HKGP) is the first population-wide whole genome sequencing (WGS) programme in Hong Kong and aimed to integrate genomic medicine into the healthcare system. Implementing genetic counselling is essential to help participants understand the genetic basis of diseases and guide informed decision making. We assessed participant experiences during the initial HKGP pilot phase that enrolled patients with undiagnosed diseases and hereditary cancers.
methodsParticipants were recruited from three partnering centres at public hospitals during June-September 2023. Participant surveys covered four domains: (1) overall satisfaction, (2) informed consent process, (3) genetic counselling, and (4) attitude towards HKGP. Associations with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were assessed with multivariable logistic regression. Qualitative feedback was collected in focus group interviews.
resultsAmong 422 eligible participants, 341 completed the survey (80.8% response) and five focus group interviews were held (21 participants). We found 89.8% [95% CI: 86.1-92.7] were satisfied with their HKGP experience. Almost all felt that HKGP participation could benefit others (86.8% [95% CI: 82.7-90.0]) and advance genomic research in Hong Kong (88.9% [95% CI: 85.0-91.9]). The survey item with the lowest agreement among respondents was feeling that HKGP participation could improve their/child's medical treatment (73.5% [95% CI: 68.5-78.0]). Those with secondary and tertiary education were less likely to agree genetic counselling was helpful (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.02 [95% CI: 0.001-0.41]; 0.02 [0.001-0.51]), or the appropriate length of time (OR: 0.12 [95% CI: 0.014-0.81]; 0.11 [0.01-0.91]). Focus group participants cited helping scientific advances and shortening the diagnostic odyssey of future patients as key reasons for participation. Participants hoped for a shorter reporting time of WGS results, additional medical follow-up, and allowing referral of relatives.
conclusionsParticipants were overall highly satisfied with the HKGP and genetic counselling experience. Satisfaction levels were comparable to overseas genomic programmes and locally provided healthcare services. Participants' major concerns on WGS reporting time could be addressed by strengthening the informed consent process to ensure their expectations align with project implementation. Emphasizing the long-term value of genomic research and its potential for personalized treatments may increase participant engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.