Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188061›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2025

Temporal prevalence and prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus and albuminuria in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Nousjka P A Vranken, Xinyu Li, Heleen Bouman, Sanne G J Mourmans, Anouk Achten, Arantxa Barandiarán Aizpurua, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Christian Knackstedt, Vanessa P M van Empel, Jerremy Weerts

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nousjka P A Vranken *Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6547-7008
Xinyu Li *Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-6937
Heleen BoumanDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2164-4011
Sanne G J MourmansDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3408-6511
Anouk AchtenDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-0763-7551
Arantxa Barandiarán AizpuruaDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3448-5531
Hans-Peter Brunner-La RoccaDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4356-8566
Christian KnackstedtDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5457-3010
Vanessa P M van Empel *Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6864-0296
Jerremy Weerts *Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. jerremy.weerts@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9369-3453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a metabolic phenotype in which comorbidities including diabetes mellitus play an important role. Factors related to impaired glucose metabolism, such as kidney disease, may contribute to adverse clinical events. Albuminuria is an early marker of kidney disease. We assessed the prevalence of impaired glucose metabolism and albuminuria in HFpEF over time, and evaluated its prognostic implications.

methodsConsecutive patients referred to our outpatient clinic and diagnosed with HFpEF between March 2015-November 2023 were included in this study. Patients with type 1 diabetes were excluded. Patients were stratified according to baseline glucose metabolism status (DM + for prediabetes and diabetes, or DM-) and albuminuria status (ALB+ or ALB- for albuminuria > 3.0 mg/mmol and normoalbuminuria, respectively). The primary outcome was a composite of HF hospitalizations (HFH) and all-cause mortality, and was analysed using multivariable-adjusted Cox-regression models.

resultsAmong 332 patients with HFpEF (median age 77 years; 67% female), 121 (36.4%) were classified as DM-/ALB-, 106 (31.9%) as DM+ /ALB-, 44 (13.3%) as DM-/ALB+, and 61 (18.4%) as DM+ /ALB+. Both baseline DM and ALB were independently associated with the primary outcome after approximately 3 years: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.97 and 1.58; 95%CI 1.04-2.41, respectively. Patients in the DM+ /ALB+ group showed the highest risk (aHR 2.85; 95%CI 1.57-5.15). After one year, DM/ALB status was re-evaluated in 250 (75%) patients. New DM+ and ALB+ incidence was 3.9% and 22%in those at risk, respectively. Patients particularly changed ALB groups compared to baseline (n = 63, 25.2%); 27 (10.8%) patients recovered from albuminuria. At 3 years follow-up, the primary outcome mainly occurred in patients who consistently showed albuminuria (27.1%) or who recovered from albuminuria (22.2%), and less so in patients who developed albuminuria after one year (13.9%) or who remained free of albuminuria (8.6%) (p = 0.008).

conclusionsDM and albuminuria are prevalent in HFpEF at baseline, and re-evaluation one year later still reveals new diagnoses. Both factors are independently associated with adverse outcomes. Albuminuria at any time point remains predictive of adverse outcomes in HFpEF. RESEARCH INSIGHTS: WHAT IS CURRENTLY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC?: Diabetes mellitus is an important cardiovascular risk factor in patients with HFpEF, contributing to disease progression and worse outcomes. Albuminuria is a prognostic marker in heart failure patients and more prevalent in patients with diabetes WHAT IS THE KEY RESEARCH QUESTION?: What is prevalence of impaired glucose metabolism and albuminuria in HFpEF over time and how does this translate to prognosis? WHAT IS NEW?: Both DM and albuminuria each independently associated with worse prognosis in HFpEF. Screening 1 year after HFpEF diagnosis yielded incidence rates of 3.9% and 10.8% for DM and prediabetes, respectively, and 22% for albuminuria. Albuminuria at any time point appeared prognostic in HFpEF, also when albuminuria recovered HOW MIGHT THIS STUDY INFLUENCE CLINICAL PRACTICE?: Intermittent screening of HFpEF patients for abnormal glucose metabolism and albuminuria is warranted to optimize risk management.

Indexed as

AlbuminuriaDiabetes MellitusDiabetic NephropathiesHeart FailureStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBlood GlucoseComorbidityFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseAlbuminuriaDiabetes mellitusHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionIncidencePrevalencePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID40188061
PMCPMC11972526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.