ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2025
Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic analyses of a rare 15q21.3 and 16p11.2 microduplication family.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCopy number variants (CNVs) are an important source of normal and pathogenic genome variations. Microduplication of 15q21.3 is rare and is associated with an increased risk of developmental retardation, corpus callosum hypoplasia, microcephaly, cardiomyopathy, optic nerve hypoplasia and so on. Microduplication of 16p11.2 is associated with 16p11.2 microduplication syndrome (OMIM: 614671). The main clinical manifestations are low birth weight, microcephaly, mental retardation, language retardation, abnormal behavior, attention deficit, schizophrenia, affective disorder, loneliness spectrum disorder and so on. Individuals who carry these two microduplications are even more rare. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this research, a 32-year-old woman (gravida 1, para 0) underwent amniocentesis at 20 weeks' gestation because the results of ultrasound showed that one of the twins was smaller than the other.
resultsCopy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) from this family revealed two types of microduplication (420 kb microduplication on chromosome 15q21.3 and 560 kb microduplication on chromosome 16p11.2) in both fetuses. Trio whole-exome sequencing (WES) showed that the two types of microduplication both originated from the father. After genetic counselling and being informed of the unfavourable prognosis, the parents decided to continue the pregnancy.
conclusionWe provide a detailed description of the phenotype in a rare family with 15q21.3 and 16p11.2 microduplication. Combination of karyotype analysis, CNV-seq, WES, prenatal ultrasound and genetic counselling is helpful for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal microdeletions/microduplications. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.