ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Development of a severity score based on the International Classification of Disease-10 for general patients visiting emergency centers.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen comparing mortality, the severity of illness or injury should be considered; therefore, scoring systems that represent severity have been developed and used. Given that diagnosis codes in the International Classification of Disease (ICD) and vital signs are part of routine data used in medical care, a severity scoring system based on these routine data would allow for the comparison of severity-adjusted treatment outcomes without substantial additional efforts.
methodsThis study was based on the National Emergency Department Information System database of the Republic of Korea. Patients aged 15 years or older were included. Data from between 2016 and 2018 were used to develop the scoring system, and data from 2019 were used for testing. We calculated the products of the number of disease-specific survival probabilities (DSPs) to reflect the severity of the patients with multiple diagnoses. A logistic regression model was developed using DSPs, age, and physiological parameters to develop a more accurate mortality prediction model.
resultsThe newly developed model showed predictive ability, as indicated by an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.975 (95% CI: 0.974-0.977). When a threshold value of -5.869 was used for determining mortality, the overall accuracy was 0.958 (0.958-0.958).
conclusionWe developed a scoring system based on ICD codes, age, and vital signs to predict the in-hospital mortality of emergency patients, and it achieved good performance. The scoring system would be useful for standardizing the severity of emergency patients and comparing treatment results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.