ReviewBMC infectious diseases2025
Clinical efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective analysis and literature review.
Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adjunctive linezolid in patients with tuberculous meningitis for the prevention of mortality or neurologic disability: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Central nervous system antituberculosis drug exposures in a rabbit model of tuberculous meningitis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Assessing transporter-mediated rifampin-linezolid interaction using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Current Status and Perspectives of Antibacterial Agents Belonging to 2-Oxazolidinones.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From linezolid to contezolid: a strategy for safe continuation of therapy in complex tuberculosis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Contezolid in tuberculous meningitis: comparable efficacy and favorable safety.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis, with high morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study evaluates the clinical efficacy of linezolid in patients with TBM.
methodsWe analyzed 99 TBM patients treated at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from June 2013 to March 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving standard therapy (n = 43) and those receiving standard therapy plus linezolid (n = 56). Clinical outcomes, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, and adverse events were assessed.
resultsOf the included patients, 42.4% were female, and the median age was 24.00 (7.00-44.00) years. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. After six months of treatment, both groups showed improvements in cerebrospinal fluid parameters, with no significant differences in intracranial pressure, white blood cell count, glucose, or chloride levels (all P > 0.05). Adding linezolid significantly reduced cerebrospinal fluid protein levels compared to the standard therapy group (0.873 [0.228-1.591] g/L vs. 0.172 [-0.691-0.559] g/L, P = 0.018), correlating with better 6-month survival (adjusted OR 1.850, 95% CI 1.111-3.081, P = 0.018), with a stronger effect in critically ill patients (1.010 [0.257-2.019] g/L vs. 0.121 [-0.556-0.510] g/L, P = 0.004). Although intracranial lesion resolution rates were higher in the linezolid group, they were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Adverse event rates were similar between groups (16.1% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.392).
conclusionLinezolid appears to offer clinical benefits in managing TBM, particularly in critically ill patients, warranting further prospective studies to optimize treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.