Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188033›Full record

ReviewBMC infectious diseases2025

Clinical efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective analysis and literature review.

Zhen-Tao Fei, Wei Huang, Dan-Ping Zhou, Yang Yang, Ping Liu, Ning Gan, Ping-Ping He, Dan Ye, Hua-Rui Liu, Xu-Hui Liu and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Contezolid in tuberculous meningitis: comparable efficacy and favorable safety.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhen-Tao Fei *Department of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wei Huang *Department of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dan-Ping Zhou *Nursing Department, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ping LiuDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ning GanDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ping-Ping HeDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dan YeDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hua-Rui LiuDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xu-Hui LiuDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. liuxuhui@shphc.org.cn.
Lu XiaDepartment of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. xialu@shphc.org.cn.

Funding

Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center KY-GW-2024-01Clinical Research Project of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center KY-GW-2025-28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis, with high morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study evaluates the clinical efficacy of linezolid in patients with TBM.

methodsWe analyzed 99 TBM patients treated at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from June 2013 to March 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving standard therapy (n = 43) and those receiving standard therapy plus linezolid (n = 56). Clinical outcomes, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, and adverse events were assessed.

resultsOf the included patients, 42.4% were female, and the median age was 24.00 (7.00-44.00) years. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. After six months of treatment, both groups showed improvements in cerebrospinal fluid parameters, with no significant differences in intracranial pressure, white blood cell count, glucose, or chloride levels (all P > 0.05). Adding linezolid significantly reduced cerebrospinal fluid protein levels compared to the standard therapy group (0.873 [0.228-1.591] g/L vs. 0.172 [-0.691-0.559] g/L, P = 0.018), correlating with better 6-month survival (adjusted OR 1.850, 95% CI 1.111-3.081, P = 0.018), with a stronger effect in critically ill patients (1.010 [0.257-2.019] g/L vs. 0.121 [-0.556-0.510] g/L, P = 0.004). Although intracranial lesion resolution rates were higher in the linezolid group, they were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Adverse event rates were similar between groups (16.1% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.392).

conclusionLinezolid appears to offer clinical benefits in managing TBM, particularly in critically ill patients, warranting further prospective studies to optimize treatment protocols.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsLinezolidTuberculosis, MeningealAdolescentAdultChildChinaFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntitubercular AgentsLinezolidCerebrospinal fluidClinical efficacyLinezolidTuberculous meningitis

Identifiers

PMID40188033
PMCPMC11972499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.