Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40188032›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2025

Comparison of the effectiveness of transversalis fascia plane block and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric lower abdominal surgeries: prospective, single blinded study.

Hasibe İrban, Can Aksu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06530147 (Comparison Of The Effectiveness Of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block And Transversus Abdominis Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia After Pediatric Lower Abdominal Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06530147 completednot on this map

Comparison Of The Effectiveness Of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block And Transversus Abdominis Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia After Pediatric Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKocaeli UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled84ConditionsPostoperative AnalgesiaArmsTransversalis Fascia Plane Block, Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hasibe İrbanClinic of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Derince State Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6940-0446
Can AksuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey. dr.aksu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-4257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchieving adequate postoperative analgesia in the pediatric age group is also important in terms of future pain perception and chronic pain development in the subsequent period. The primary aim of our study was to compare the effects of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) and Transversalis Fascia Plane (TFP) blocks on pain scores at the 6th postoperative hour in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Secondary aims include the observation of pain scores over the first 24 h postoperatively, the duration until the first analgesic requirement, the presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting symptoms, and the satisfaction of parents with the provided analgesia method.

methodsPatients aged between 1 and 7 years, classified as ASA I-II, who were scheduled for elective surgery for undescended testes and inguinal hernia, were included in our study. The study was designed as a prospective observational study. The patients were divided into two groups: TAP block (n = 42) and TFP block (n = 42). Intraoperative remifentanil consumption, hemodynamic parameters, postoperative FLACC pain scores, analgesic requirements, and the time of the first analgesic need were recorded for 24 h.

resultsA total of 84 patients were included in the study. The groups were similar in terms of demographic data. No difference was found in FLACC pain scores between the groups that received both TAP and TFP blocks in patients followed for 24 h postoperatively (p > 0.05). Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was similar in TAP blocks 74 (20-100) and TFP blocks 40 (24.75-71) µg, (p: 0.268). When calculating based on the first analgesic consumption for TAP and TFP groups, it is found that the median analgesic effect durations were 12 and 9 h, respectively, for the two groups.

conclusionsIn children undergoing lower abdominal surgery, ultrasound-guided TAP and TFP blocks have shown similar effects on pain scores and analgesic requirements for 24 h postoperatively. We believe that both blocks, which we found to provide analgesia without the need for opioids after lower abdominal surgery in pediatric patients, can be safely used in this patient group. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT06530147.

Indexed as

Nerve BlockPostoperative PainAbdomenAbdominal MusclesAnalgesics, OpioidChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMalePain MeasurementProspective StudiesRemifentanilSingle-Blind MethodAnalgesics, OpioidRemifentanilLower abdominal surgeryPediatricPostoperative analgesiaTransversalis fascia plane blockTransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID40188032
PMCPMC11971910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.