ArticleBMC oral health2025
Accuracy analysis of all-ceramic crowns with different materials in CAD/CAM digital replication mode.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of bonding of clear aligner attachments on aesthetic crown materials: a systematic review ofFrontiers in dental medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of restorative material, intraoral scanner, and digital workflow on the marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM all-ceramic crowns: anThe journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study aimed to evaluate the three-dimensional accuracy of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in fabricating all-ceramic crowns using various cuttable materials, assessed through reverse engineering.
methodsThe original resin tooth morphology of the left maxillary mesial incisor and left maxillary first molar from a standard resin tooth model, along with the two corresponding prepared teeth, were scanned and imported into exocad software. The digitally reproduced crown morphology was utilized to fabricate crowns from cut porcelain-reinforced resin ceramic (Uh group, Upcera Hyramic), lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (e.max group, IPS e.max Cad), and zirconia ceramic (Ue group, Upcera Explore). All specimens were subsequently rescanned, and the root mean square (RMS) values were calculated after overlaying with the original crown CAD data using the 3D analysis software Geomagic Studio 2013 to compare the dimensional accuracy.
resultsAmong the mesial incisor and first molar specimens, the e.max group demonstrated the highest dimensional accuracy of the all-ceramic crowns, followed by the Ue group, while the Uh group exhibited the lowest accuracy. The differences in dimensional accuracy among the three groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe digital replication technique effectively restored the original crown morphology with a high degree of accuracy. For the same CAM pattern, the dimensional accuracy of all-ceramic crowns varied depending on the CAD/CAM porcelain material, with lithium disilicate glass-ceramic showing the superior results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.