ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
The work system of prehospital medication administration: a qualitative mixed methods study with ambulance professionals.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An inter-rater reliability study of a modified version of SATS as a prehospital triage tool.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Patterns and determinants of medication use by paramedics in German prehospital emergency care: a six-year multicenter analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe characteristics of medication administration within the prehospital setting are underexplored. Ambulance professionals operate under varied levels of responsibility, dependent on their training and collaboration with local emergency facilities and other medical personnel. Given the critical condition of many patients using these services and the challenging environments they operate in, the risk of adverse drug events is significant. The aim was to advance the knowledge of the medication administration process in the setting of ambulance services.
methodsA qualitative mixed-methods design was applied to examine the medication administration process among ambulance professionals in a Norwegian hospital trust. Data collection included individual semi-structured interviews with 11 ambulance professionals at three ambulance stations, complemented by 114 h of observations. Interviews and observations were guided by the System Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) work system model, and data were analyzed using a combined deductive-inductive content analysis.
resultsThe medication administration process in the ambulance work system is condensed into three stages: preparation, administration, and patient transfer, primarily due to constraints related to time and available information. The medication administration work system is influenced by a set of eight interrelated categories. These include technological aspects such as workarounds necessitated by inadequate equipment, organizational dynamics such as the fluid delegation of tasks, physical environmental conditions that impact on decision-making, and personal factors such as collaboration in managing critical patient scenarios.
conclusionMedication administration tasks in the ambulance service take place along a continuum involving physical, technological, and organizational factors that interact and continuously influence ambulance professionals in their everyday practices. The study highlights the need for enhanced medication administration processes in ambulance services through improved collaboration, training, technological usability, and organizational adaptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.