Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2025
Feasibility study of using perfusion index to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion: an observational study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, no objective indicators are available to predict the optimal timing for laryngeal mask insertion. Anesthesia depth monitoring devices such as the Bispectral Index (BIS) are not widely applicable for day-surgery patients due to their high cost. Previous literature has reported a correlation between the perfusion index (PI) and the anesthesia depth. Thus, the aim of this study is to verify whether the PI can serve as an indicator for predicting the timing of laryngeal mask insertion.
methodsThis trial was conducted at a specialized pediatric hospital, with a final enrollment of 164 pediatric patients. After the children entered the room, baseline vital signs and PI
resultsThe area under the ROC curve (AUC) for using PI to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion was 0.641 (95% confidence interval, 0.542-0.740), P = 0.009, and the cutoff value was 4.37. When PI > 4.37 was used to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion, the sensitivity was 53.2%, and the specificity was 73.7%. The AUC for using the PI ratio to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion was 0.751 (95% confidence interval, 0.657-0.844), P < 0.001, and the cutoff value was 2.955. When the PI ratio > 2.955 was used to predict the timing of laryngeal mask insertion, the sensitivity was 85.7%, and the specificity was 63.2%.
conclusionThe PI ratio is more suitable than PI alone for predicting the timing of laryngeal mask insertion. When PI increases to three times the baseline PI after induction, laryngeal mask insertion can be considered. CLINICAL
trial registrationThis trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn . Registration number ChiCTR2400083111, Weiwei Cai, 16 April 2024.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.