Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40187949›Full record

ReviewPlacenta2025

How can artificial intelligence models advance placental biology?

Teresa Chou, Jeffery A Goldstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Placenta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Modeling human placental biology: a review of organoid technologies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Standardized Placental Pathology Reporting: Improving Quality and Clinical Utility Recommendations From the Society for Pediatric Pathology Placental Pathology Reporting Task Force.Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teresa ChouDepartment of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jeffery A GoldsteinDepartment of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: ja.goldstein@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Developing a virtual placenta biobankK08EB030120 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERY A · 2020 to 2023
$575k
NIBIB NIH HHS K08 EB030120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placenta is a vital organ that supports the developing fetus during pregnancy. Histologic examination of the placenta can reveal abnormalities in morphology and structure that impact placental function. Machine learning (ML) models have been successfully developed for digital pathology, leveraging rich image datasets from human tissue. ML models can be advantageous to placenta researchers, either by supplementing pathologist expertise or providing knowledge to inform future hypothesis generation. Research projects fall into several categories: Cell classification methods have been introduced to the placental disc and membranes. Cell classification is useful as a "bottom up" approach to characterizing tissue, using smaller image inputs than at a tissue region or whole slide level. Classification of normal tissues, cells, and development can identify pathologies that deviate. Several studies have identified pathologies within the great obstetric syndromes or placental inflammation. These studies often use mechanisms to aggregate findings from small images patches up to the whole slide level. Digital pathology slides are rich with data that inform our knowledge of placental function and disease - while many articles focus on model design and performance, the features extracted can add valuable biological and clinical knowledge to the field.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceFetal inflammatory responseMachine learningMaternal inflammatory responseMaternal vascular malperfusionPlacenta histopathology

Identifiers

PMID40187949
PMCPMC12354075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.