ArticleHarmful algae2025
Growth and anatoxin-a production of Microcoleus (Cyanobacteria) strains from streams in California, USA.
Article in Harmful algae, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population and herbarium genomics provide a comprehensive framework for a revision of Microcoleus (Cyanobacteria).Journal of phycology · 2026Article
- Elucidation of Mechanisms by Which Microplastics (PET) Facilitates the Rapid Growth of Benthic Cyanobacteria and Toxin Production in Aquatic Ecosystems.Metabolites · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Benthic cyanobacterial proliferations are an emerging concern globally due to their potential for toxin production and subsequent negative environmental and health impacts. Microcoleus is a common mat-forming genus reported to produce potent neurotoxin, anatoxin-a, ingestion of which has been associated with animal mortalities. Six different unialgal monoclonal strains of Microcoleus were isolated from streams in California and grown in batch culture for 49 days. The four toxic strains were identified using a polyphasic approach as belonging to the species Microcoleus anatoxicus, which expands its known distribution throughout the Klamath River and Rock Creek watersheds in northern California. The non-toxic strains from the Eel River belonged to Microcoleus sp. 1. Maximum toxin production occurred during the exponential growth phase, and peaked 6-13 days later in more toxic strains, with a persistently higher fraction of extracellular toxins compared to less toxic strains, which had maximum toxin concentrations at day 13. The proposed mechanism of toxin release into culture medium was through damage to the cell walls of unhealthy filaments. Peak toxin production was energetically expensive for all M. anatoxicus strains, evidenced by reduced specific growth rates at the time of peak toxin production, followed by quick recovery of cell division. Despite this, more toxic strains achieved faster maximum growth rates than the less toxic and non-toxic strains under luxurious nutrient culture conditions. Differential toxin and growth rate responses of M. anatoxicus strains from wide geographical ranges under the same laboratory-controlled conditions suggest high intraspecific variation, which may represent challenges for harmful algal blooms mitigation. More toxic strains have the potential to proliferate and consistently release extracellular anatoxins into the environment. This study provides a baseline to understanding the growth and toxin kinetics of two commonly occurring Microcoleus species in northern California which may help benthic harmful cyanobacteria management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.