ArticleBMJ open2025
Paediatric oncology short learning programmes for nurses: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to map the content, duration, delivery methods and modes of assessment for paediatric oncology nursing education and training programmes.
designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: Published articles were retrieved from Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Dimensions, Embase, PubMed and Scopus. Additional articles were identified from the reference list of the included studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles that described or reported on a paediatric oncology nursing education and training programme, from any setting, published in English from 2012 to 2022. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts and full texts. Data were extracted using a standardised data extraction tool. Content analysis using basic coding of data was performed. The findings are presented in figures and tables, and the results are described narratively.
resultsThis review included 15 articles. Content identified for paediatric oncology education and training programmes included supportive care, chemotherapy, overview of paediatric oncology, management of venous access devices, oncological emergencies, nursing considerations, infection prevention and control, paediatric cancers, patient and family education, communication, ethical legal considerations, grief and bereavement, and overview of haematological cancers. Didactic methods used included traditional face-to-face and virtual approaches to deliver theoretical and practical content. The duration of the programmes ranged from 2 hours to 6 months. Both qualitative and quantitative methods of assessment were used before, during and after the training.
conclusionThis review offers valuable insights for the development of paediatric oncology education and training programmes for nurses. It provides comprehensive guidance on key content, duration, delivery methods and modes of assessment. However, there is a need to consider context-specific issues and availability of resources when developing the programmes to ensure relevance and sustainability. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X3Q4H).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.