Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40187776›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Personalised selection of medication for newly diagnosed adult epilepsy: study protocol of a first-in-class, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Daniel Thom, Richard Shek-Kwan Chang, Natasha A Lannin, Zanfina Ademi, Zongyuan Ge, David Reutens, Terence O'Brien, Wendyl D'Souza, Piero Perucca, Sandra Reeder and 19 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Daniel ThomDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8939-2885
Richard Shek-Kwan ChangDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-3877
Natasha A LanninDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-8345
Zanfina AdemiDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-3522
Zongyuan GeDepartment of Data Science and AI, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
David ReutensDepartment of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Terence O'BrienDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Wendyl D'SouzaDepartment of Neurology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Piero PeruccaBladin-Berkovic Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Sandra ReederDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7942-0179
Armin NikpourDepartment of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Chong WongThe Brain and Spine Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Michelle KileyDepartment of Neurology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jacqui-Lyn SawDepartment of Neurology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
John-Paul NicoloDepartment of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-6475
Udaya SeneviratneDepartment of Neurology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Patrick CarneyDepartment of Neurosciences and Eastern Health Clinical School, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Dean JonesDepartment of Neurology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Ernest SomervilleDepartment of Neurology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clare StapletonLived Experience Expert, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emma FosterDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8958-3844
Lata VadlamudiDepartment of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
David N VaughanEpilepsy Research Centre, Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James LeeDepartment of Neurology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Tania FarrarDepartment of Neurology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark HowardDepartment of Philosophy, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert SparrowDepartment of Philosophy, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Zhibin ChenDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Patrick KwanDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia patrick.kwan@monash.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelection of antiseizure medications (ASMs) for newly diagnosed epilepsy remains largely a trial-and-error process. We have developed a machine learning (ML) model using retrospective data collected from five international cohorts that predicts response to different ASMs as the initial treatment for individual adults with new-onset epilepsy. This study aims to prospectively evaluate this model in Australia using a randomised controlled trial design. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: At least 234 adult patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy will be recruited from 14 centres in Australia. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to the ML group or usual care group. The ML group will receive the ASM recommended by the model unless it is considered contraindicated by the neurologist. The usual care group will receive the ASM selected by the neurologist alone. Both the patient and neurologists conducting the follow-up will be blinded to the group assignment. Both groups will be followed up for 52 weeks to assess treatment outcomes. Additional information on adverse events, quality of life, mood and use of healthcare services and productivity will be collected using validated questionnaires. Acceptability of the model will also be assessed.The primary outcome will be the proportion of participants who achieve seizure-freedom (defined as no seizures during the 12-month follow-up period) while taking the initially prescribed ASM. Secondary outcomes include time to treatment failure, time to first seizure after randomisation, changes in mood assessment score and quality of life score, direct healthcare costs, and loss of productivity during the treatment period.This trial will provide class I evidence for the effectiveness of a ML model as a decision support tool for neurologists to select the first ASM for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Alfred Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Project 130/23). Findings will be presented in academic conferences and submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12623000209695.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsyPrecision MedicineAdultAustraliaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsArtificial IntelligenceClinical TrialEpilepsyMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40187776
PMCPMC11973792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.