ArticleRMD open2025
Venous vessel-wall assessment with superb microvascular imaging in Behçet syndrome.
Article in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Behçet's Syndrome.Current rheumatology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSuperb microvascular imaging (SMI) provides a more sensitive assessment of small vessels compared with power and colour Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS and CDUS). We aimed to investigate the potential of SMI for use in research and clinical practice in Behçet syndrome (BS) and to gain a better understanding of erythema nodosum (EN) like and superficial thrombophlebitis (STM) lesions using SMI.
methodsWe studied 51 patients with BS and 31 patients with non-BS with red palpable lesions on physical examination. B-mode US, CDUS, PDUS and SMI were performed and recorded by the same radiologist and recorded images were additionally evaluated independently by another radiologist. Vessel-wall signal intensity of STM lesions by SMI was graded in four groups according to the percentages of the affected vessel-wall area (Grade 0: no signal, Grade 1: < 25%, Grade 2: 25%-50%, Grade 3: 50%-75% and Grade 4: >75%).
resultsThe lesions of 26 patients with BS and 17 patients with non-BS were diagnosed as STM with CDUS. SMI of STM lesions revealed vessel-wall signals in 21/26 patients with BS (81%), in contrast to only 3/17 (18%) patients with non-BS. While 16 of 21 patients with BS (76%) had at least grade 2 signal, only 1 of 3 non-BS had it. Lesions of 25 BS and 11 non-BS were diagnosed as EN by CDUS and SMI showed no vessel-wall signal in these patients.
conclusionsEvaluation of the vessel wall with SMI in BS may be a promising approach for showing inflammation as an inexpensive, non-invasive and reliable imaging method that does not require a contrast agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.