ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Relative age as a risk factor for psychiatric diagnoses in children born preterm and to term: a cohort study.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess relative age effects (how the youngest children in a school class are at increased risk compared with their older classmates) on healthcare use with psychiatric diagnoses in childhood and adolescence within preterm and term-born boys and girls. DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS: Registry-based cohort study including individuals born in Norway from 1991 to 2012 with follow-up data from the National Patient Registry from 2008 to 2017 when they were aged between 4 and 18 years. EXPOSURES: Relative age was defined according to birth month and grouped in four 3-month periods. Gestational age at birth (GA week+days) was categorised into preterm (GA 23+0-36+6) and term (GA 37+0-41+6).
main outcome measuresThe presence of psychiatric diagnoses (any diagnosis and specific diagnosis groups according to ICD-10) in data from specialist healthcare contacts at different ages during follow-up was compared between relative age groups in preterm and term born using generalised estimating equation logistic regression analyses.
resultsOf 1 109 411 individuals, 7% were born preterm. Relative age effects for psychiatric diagnosis and specific diagnosis groups were seen for both preterm and term-born boys and girls, with the strongest estimates for any psychiatric diagnosis in the relatively younger preterm girls born in October-December, compared with the relatively older preterm girls born in January-March (OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.63) at ages 4-10 years).
conclusionsRelative age effects were widely demonstrated for healthcare use with psychiatric diagnoses within term and preterm born, for both girls and boys. The excess risk for those born late in the year added to already existing adversity in children born preterm, emphasising the need for additional consideration related to school and societal structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.