ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
Characteristics of second primary malignancies following bispecific antibodies therapy.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Correspondence on 'Characteristics of second primary malignancies following bispecific antibodies therapy' by LiangJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- The silent signals: emerging safety concerns in bispecific antibody therapy for multiple myeloma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe risk of secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) associated with bispecific antibody (BsAb)-a promising alternative to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy-remains insufficiently explored.
methodsUsing large-scale, real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System, we identified the relative frequency and characteristics of SPMs following BsAbs therapy and conducted a comprehensive comparison of treatment-related SPM profiles between BsAbs and CAR-T therapies.
resultsWe identified 108 cases among 10,280 BsAb-treated patients. The incidence risk of SPMs was stable over the past 8 years, accounting for 1-2% of all adverse events, with a case fatality rate of 29.63% among the SPM cases. Myeloid leukemias and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were more frequent in blinatumomab recipients, while solid malignancies predominated in those treated with teclistamab. Time-to-onset (TTO) was significantly shorter in BsAb recipients compared with non-recipients, with weight and treatment duration influencing TTO, while no significant differences in TTO were observed across different BsAb products, ages, and genders. Our findings highlight the first year of BsAbs as a critical window for early detection and intervention. Although the overall risk of SPMs was lower with BsAbs than with CAR-T, the outcomes of SPMs were comparable in both groups. TTO and SPM patterns were statistically similar between the two therapies.
conclusionOur study provides the first detailed characterization of SPMs post-BsAb, underscoring the need for continued pharmacovigilance and individualized risk management to mitigate SPM risks in patients undergoing BsAb therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.