Trial reportThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2025
A randomized trial of open lung protective ventilation compared to conventional mechanical ventilation in deceased organ donors.
Trial report in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03439995 (Goal of Open Lung Ventilation in Donors), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Goal of Open Lung Ventilation in Donors
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe conducted a randomized trial of open lung protective ventilation (OLPV) compared to conventional ventilation (CV) in deceased donors. The primary outcome was lung utilization for transplantation.
methodsEligible donors were ≥13 years with PaO
resultsOne hundred and fifty three donors were randomized (74 to OLPV, 79 to CV) and included in the final analysis. Median duration of treatment was 50 hours and did not differ by arm. Donor lung utilization was 23% in the OLPV arm and 22% in the CV arm, p = 0.85. Change in PaO
conclusionsAn open lung protective ventilator strategy was safe but did not improve donor lung utilization or oxygenation compared to a conventional ventilator strategy in a population of US organ donors. NCT03439995.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.