Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186992›Full record

ArticleVaccine2025

A national cross-sectional study of dentists' vaccine hesitancy and intention to provide HPV vaccines following emergency COVID-19 vaccination authorization.

Priscilla M Flynn, Cynthia Stull, Vedushi M Jain, Michael D Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Priscilla M FlynnDepartment of Public and Primary Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, 9-372 Moos Tower, 515 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America. Electronic address: Flynn125@umn.edu.
Cynthia StullDepartment of Public and Primary Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, 9-372 Moos Tower, 515 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.
Vedushi M JainResearch Assistant, RELab, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, 308 Harvard Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States of America.
Michael D EvansClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, 2221 University Ave SE Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States of America.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UM1TR004405 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bruce R Blazar, Damien A Fair · 2023 to 2026
$30.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOropharyngeal cancers are the most common human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers in the United States, yet are largely preventable with timely administration of the HPV vaccine. While the two-dose vaccine is currently underutilized, one strategy to meet the 2030 HPV vaccination goal is to expand dentists' scope of practice to include vaccination. This study was conducted to report dentists' willingness to administer the HPV vaccine to their patients if allowed by state legislation, and to what extent vaccine hesitancy affected their decision.

methodsA representative sample of currently licensed dentists (n = 902) completed an electronic survey measuring their willingness to administer the HPV vaccine, vaccine hesitancy using the 5C model, and current HPV vaccination knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviors. The Transtheoretical Model was used to dichotomize dentists' willingness to provide the HPV vaccine as either 'pre-action' or 'action +', facilitating logistic regression analysis. RESULTS/

conclusionThis study found that over half (56.2 %) of the 902 dentists surveyed reported willingness to administer the HPV vaccine in their practice. Modifiable factors associated with willingness to vaccinate include currently recommending the HPV vaccine to patients, comfort in administering vaccinations, previous training to provide COVID-19 vaccinations, and appropriate practice infrastructures to administer HPV vaccinations. Only the 5C vaccine hesitancy model construct of "Constraints" was predictive of the willingness to administer the HPV vaccine. These findings indicate a need for dentistry to prioritize knowledge and skills-based training in HPV vaccine communication and administration to prepare dentists to provide vaccines in their practices as state legislation allows.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDentistsPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedCOVID-19 VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesDentistsHuman papillomavirus vaccinesOropharyngeal neoplasmsTranstheoretical modelVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40186992
PMCPMC12110664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.