Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186876›Full record

ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2025

Advances in cancer nanovaccines: a focus on colorectal cancer.

Yalda Ghazizadeh, Hossein Salehi Shadkami, Fatemeh Madani, Sedigheh Niknam, Mahdi Adabi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yalda GhazizadehStudent Research Committee, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein Salehi ShadkamiNanomedicine Student Association (NMA), Student's Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh MadaniDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sedigheh NiknamInstitute of Nano Science and Nano Technology, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.
Mahdi AdabiDepartment of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology has revolutionized cancer treatment by providing innovative solutions through nanocancer therapies, nanovaccines, and nanoparticles. This review focuses on the application of these technologies in colorectal cancer (CRC), highlighting their progression from preclinical studies to clinical trials. Nanoparticles, including liposomes, silica, gold, and lipid nanoparticles, possess unique properties that enhance drug delivery, improve therapeutic efficacy, and minimize systemic toxicity. Additionally, nanovaccines are being developed to elicit robust immune responses against CRC cells. This paper offers a comprehensive overview of the current state of nanotechnology-based treatments for CRC, emphasizing key preclinical studies and clinical trials that demonstrate their potential. Furthermore, the review discusses the challenges faced in this field. It outlines future directions for research, underscoring the need for ongoing efforts to translate these promising technologies into practical clinical applications.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesColorectal NeoplasmsNanoparticlesAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLiposomesNanomedicineNanotechnologyNanovaccinesCancer VaccinesLiposomesNanovaccinescolorectalNanocancernanoparticlesnanovaccines

Identifiers

PMID40186876
PMCPMC12051617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.