ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2025
Fluorescence characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in bottled drinking water of different countries: A potential risk to public health.
Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking Soil Health and Surface Water Quality Management: A Review on Fluorescent Dissolved Organic Matter (fDOM) in Agricultural Systems.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Review
- Fluorescence characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in bottled drinking water of different countries: A potential risk to public health.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bottled drinking water of numerous brands from different countries, including Bangladesh, Malaysia, Australia, India, Singapore, Norway, Japan, Vietnam, and Taiwan, were studied using three-dimensional fluorescence (excitation-emission matrix, EEM) spectroscopy and multivariate parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) model. Fluorescent-dissolved organic matter (DOM) components such as microbial processed tyrosine-, fulvic acid (M)-, and tryptophan-like had maximum intensity/concentration at 70.8%, 16.7%, and 12.5% bottled drinking water samples, respectively. The total intensity of all fluorescing DOM components was minimum and maximum in one of the brands from Australia and Vietnam, respectively. Unlike in Japan, the concentrations of DOM components in bottled drinking water were comparable to or higher than groundwater, freshwater, and marine water in Bangladesh, Malaysia, India, and Taiwan. The concentration of Escherichia coli was quantified from its significant correlation equation with the microbial-processed tryptophan-like component. Apart from 60% and 20% of bottled water samples from Malaysia and Bangladesh, the remaining samples of studied countries were medium to very high-risk because of E. coli signatures. The adverse health impacts from previously identified over-acceptable-limit mineral concentrations in bottled drinking water are discussed. DOM components at such concentrations in bottled drinking water also strengthened doubts about the efficiency of conventional water treatment techniques and biofilm control. Economic indicators of the studied countries affirmed that willingness and proper management knowledge are necessary to ensure safe bottled drinking water besides budget and labor wages. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Higher protein-like components intensity than humic-like affirmed microbial abundance Risks for E. coli availability was medium to very high in maximum samples Adverse health impacts for overlimit Pb, Al, and PO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.