Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186790›Full record

SynthesisBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025

Different strategies in de-escalation of axillary surgery in node-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes.

Vivian Man, Jiaxu Duan, Wing-Pan Luk, Ling-Hiu Fung, Ava Kwong

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Axillary management in patients with cN + breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pattern of practice in Italy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vivian ManDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Jiaxu DuanThe University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Wing-Pan LukMedical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Ling-Hiu FungMedical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Ava KwongDaniel CK Yu Professor in Breast Cancer Research, Chief of Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. avakwong@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6968-9489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDifferent surgical options existed in the management of axilla among breast cancer patients who were initially node-positive and were converted node-negative after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). De-escalation of axillary surgery was feasible, but previous studies focused on the false-negative rate (FNR) of respective procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB), MARI procedure, and targeted axillary dissection (TAD). PATIENTS AND

methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library literature databases were searched systematically. Studies were eligible if they addressed the axillary recurrence rate of patients with nodal pathological complete response (pCR) and omission of axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) after NST. Pooled analysis was performed using inverse variance methods for logit transformed proportions.

resultsEleven retrospective studies and three prospective studies involving 4268 patients with node-positive breast cancers were included. A total of 1650 patients achieved nodal pCR and avoided ALND, 1382 patients with SLNB only and 268 patients with MARI/TAD. The pooled estimate of axillary recurrence was 2.1% (95%CI 1.4-3.2%) for patients with negative SLNB and 1.5% (95% CI 0.5-4.1%) for patients with negative MARI/TAD. There was no significant benefit of ALND over SLNB in patients with nodal pCR after NST. Pooled estimates of 5-year DFS, DDFS, and OS of SLNB alone were 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.90], 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.92), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.94), respectively.

conclusionBreast cancer patients who are converted node-negative after NST have extremely low nodal recurrence rate, irrespective of the choice of axillary surgery. Omission of ALND is oncologically safe in patients who have nodal pCR after NST.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionAxillaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapySentinel lymph node biopsyTargeted axillary dissection

Identifiers

PMID40186790
PMCPMC12174186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.