ArticlePlanta2025
Modeling budbreak precocity in grapevine: insights from comparative gene expression analysis in single-node cuttings.
Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chilling Accumulation Shapes Transcriptomic Responses to Warming Exposure During Grapevine Deacclimation.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionSingle-node cuttings are an effective tool for the study of grapevine's budbreak timing and cultivar-specific regulation of shared molecular/physiological processes, ABA and VviFT key role. Global warming is known to accelerate buds' phenological development and increase spring frost damage risk in several areas of the world. All studies in this area involve monitoring this intricate process, which is in the field time-consuming and challenging due to the considerable influence of environmental factors. This work explores the possibility of studying dormancy in grapevine by means of single-node cuttings of early- and late-bud break model cultivars Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon. Both visual phenotyping and differential thermal analysis confirmed the expected different pace of dormancy release in the two varieties. In addition, specific Gene Ontology (GO) categories with similar but shifted expression patterns between early-bud break Chardonnay and late-budbreak Cabernet Sauvignon have been identified, suggesting cultivar-specific regulation of shared molecular processes. Notably, the VviFT gene aligns with this timing shift, indicating its potential role in budbreak. We further confirm the importance of ABA inhibition in growth resumption and identify genes like VviSVP2 and VviDRM1 as possible dormancy release repressors. Our study enhances the understanding of the molecular network underpinning dormancy in grapevine buds and provides a robust framework for future research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.