Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186747›Full record

ReviewRheumatology and therapy2025

Disease-Modifying Therapies in Lupus Nephritis: A Narrative Review Evaluating Currently Used Pharmacologic Agents.

Anca D Askanase, Richard Furie, Maria Dall'Era, Andrew S Bomback, Andreas Schwarting, Ming-Hui Zhao, Ian N Bruce, Munther Khamashta, Bernard Rubin, Angela Carroll and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anca D AskanaseDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Richard FurieDivision of Rheumatology, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA.
Maria Dall'EraDivision of Rheumatology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrew S BombackDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andreas SchwartingRheumatology Center Rhineland Palatinate, Bad Kreuznach, Germany.
Ming-Hui ZhaoRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ian N BruceThe University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Munther KhamashtaMedical Affairs, GSK, Dubai, UAE.
Bernard RubinUS Medical Affairs, GSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Angela CarrollUS Medical Affairs, GSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Roger Abramino LevySpecialty Care, Global Medical Affairs, GSK, 1250 S Collegeville Rd, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA. roger.x.levy@gsk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6393-6031
Ronald van VollenhovenDepartment of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Murray B UrowitzProfessor Emeritus, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As more lupus nephritis (LN) medications become available, identifying treatments that are disease-modifying is critical in making treatment decisions. Based on our 2022 published working definition of LN disease modification as 'minimizing disease activity with the fewest treatment-associated toxicities and slowing progression to end-stage kidney disease' (ESKD), the objective of this review was to classify current LN treatments according to the proposed kidney disease modification criteria, excluding toxicities. Based upon a selection of LN clinical trial (n = 27) and observational study (n = 20) publications, as well as the authors' clinical experiences, we evaluated the disease modification potential for 16 LN treatments (inclusive of antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, calcineurin inhibitors and biologics) according to the proposed kidney disease activity and organ damage criteria at year 1, years 2-5, and > 5-year time points. Fulfilling criteria at year 1 and years 2-5 was considered evidence for disease modification potential. Satisfying criteria at > 5 years (slowing or preventing progression in SLICC/ACR Damage Index [SDI] and ESKD, and/or doubling of serum creatinine) was used to confirm disease modification. Each treatment was designated as one of the following at each time point: (a) criterion met; (b) inconclusive; (c) no available supportive data. This review excluded an assessment of potential toxicities. All LN treatments met at least one of the potential kidney disease-modification criteria at any time point, but limited relevant data in the literature meant disease modification > 5 years could only be confirmed for cyclophosphamide. Belimumab met more criteria across the three time points than any other biologic treatment but lacked > 5-year data to confirm disease modification. Further research is needed to support the classification of LN treatments as disease modifiers, particularly for > 5 years. We discuss considerations for future studies, challenges to the classification, and possible updates to published criteria.

Indexed as

Biological productsGlucocorticoidsLupus erythematosusLupus nephritisSystemic

Identifiers

PMID40186747
PMCPMC12084441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.