ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2025
Biosimilars versus biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: challenges and targeting strategies using drug delivery systems.
Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Gut Microbiota Alterations in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Long-Term Biologic Therapy: A Pilot Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Interpreting Biomarker Discordance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Beyond Fecal Calprotectin and C-Reactive Protein.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Practical guidelines on medical management of adults with moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026Article
- Acid-enhanced drinkable hydrogel co-delivering riboflavin-loaded nanozymes for orchestrated inflammation-immune modulation and redox homeostasis in colitis therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Infectious Risks Associated with Biologic Therapies in Autoimmune, Rheumatologic and Dermatologic Diseases: A Narrative Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Engineered cell-biomimetic nanosystems for anti-inflammatory therapy: Targeting, neutralization and immunomodulation.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Crohn's Disease in Malaysia: Could Application of the Precautionary Principle Reduce Future Incidence?Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Advances in the Management of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Biologics to Small Molecules.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The interplay mechanisms between gut microbiota and ferroptosis in inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Celastrol Activates HSF1 to Enhance Regulatory T Cells Function and Ameliorate Intestinal Inflammation.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Management Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Drug Persistence of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Under Biological Treatment in the Pre IL-23 Era in a Tertiary Referral Center in Germany.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Cyclosporine in the Treatment of Severe Ulcerative Colitis in the Pediatric Population: A Narrative Review Exploring Known Strategies and New Possibilities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Roles of Deubiquitinases OTUD3 and OTUD5 in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Inflammatory bowel disease in paediatrics: Navigating the old challenges and emerging frontiers.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Artificial Sweeteners: A Double-Edged Sword for Gut Microbiome.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a multifactorial illness with a climbing prevalence worldwide. While biologics are commonly prescribed especially for severe cases, they may worsen patients' outcomes due to financial burden. Consequently, there has been an increased focus on biosimilars to improve overall disease outcomes by maintaining similar efficacy and safety while minimizing the cost of therapy. Infliximab-dyyb was the first biosimilar approved by US-FDA for IBD. Since that, the US-FDA approved 14 biosimilars with different mechanisms of action and different routes of administration for IBD patients (four infliximab biosimilars, nine adalimumab biosimilars, and most recently one ustekinumab biosimilar). It should be noted that more biologics are in the pipeline as golimumab and natalizumab patents are set to expire in the near future, and biosimilars are now in pre-clinical to phase 3 trials. Different studies have evaluated biologics' effectiveness and safety and concluded that the majority of available biosimilars are efficacious and have similar adverse effect profiles compared to their reference biologics. It is worth mentioningthat post-marketing surveillance reports revealed some risks associated with biosimilars which should be taken into consideration in future research and clinical trials to avoid health hazards. Most biologics and biosimilars are administered parenterally which results in several drawbacks such as raised risk of infections, hypersensitivity, autoimmunity, development of malignancies, liver toxicity as well as worsening of heart failure. Several drug delivery systems based on passive and active targeting mechanisms are under active investigation to overcome these limitations. This review sheds light on the emergence of biologics and biosimilars as alternatives in IBD management, the differences between them, challenges and risks, and future perspectives in IBD therapy and new trends in drug delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.