ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
The use of oral anticoagulation at the time of acute COVID-19 infection and subsequent development of long-COVID/post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blood pro-thrombotic analytes and platelet activation are associated with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long COVID (LC) or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is defined as ongoing, relapsing or new symptoms/conditions persisting after an acute COVID-19 infection. Given the potential role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in treating thrombotic sequelae of LC/PASC, we investigated whether prevalent OAC use at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced development of LC/PASC. Retrospective cohort study within the TriNetx network. The primary cohort was defined as adults with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. We defined OAC users as those who had received OACs (either direct-acting OACs [DOACs] or vitamin K antagonists [VKA]) in the preceding 3-months and non-users as those without OAC use within the previous 12-months. The primary outcome was a composite of 9 features associated with LC/PASC We identified 38,409 DOAC users, 19,243 VKA users, and 2,329,771 non-OAC users with acute COVID-19 infection. After successful propensity score matching (PSM), we found an increased risk of LC/PASC features in those receiving DOAC compared to non-OAC (HR [95% CI] 1.50 [1.35 to 1.68], p < 0.0001), and in VKA users compared to non-OACs (HR [95% CI] 1.98 [1.78 to 2.20], p < 0.0001), while DOAC users were at reduced risk compared to VKA users (HR [95% CI] 0.71 [0.62 to 0.81], p < 0.0001). We found no evidence that prevalent OAC at the time of acute COVID-19 infection was associated with reduced risk of LC/PASC. Further work is needed to understand whether there is a role for OAC therapy in the management of LC/PASC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.