Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186685›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2025

The effect of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily basal insulin on physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of ONWARDS 1-5.

Michael C Riddell, Simon Heller, Lisbeth Carstensen, Thaís M Pagliaro Rocha, Sara Kehlet Watt, Vincent C Woo

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04460885 phase3completednot on this map

A 78-week Trial Comparing the Effect and Safety of Once Weekly Insulin Icodec and Once Daily Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL, Both in Combination With Non-insulin Anti-diabetic Treatment, in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2020 to 2022Enrolled984ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsInsulin icodec, Insulin glargine
NCT04760626 phase3completednot on this map

Effectiveness and Safety of Once Weekly Insulin Icodec Used With DoseGuide Versus Once Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in an Insulin naïve Type 2 Diabetes Population in a Clinical Practice Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1,085ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsInsulin icodec, Insulin Glargine 100U/mL, Insulin Degludec, Insulin Glargine 300U/mL
NCT04770532 phase3completednot on this map

A 26-week Trial Comparing the Effect and Safety of Once Weekly Insulin Icodec and Once Daily Insulin Degludec, Both With or Without Non-insulin Anti-diabetic Drugs, in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2021 to 2022Enrolled526ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsInsulin degludec, Insulin Icodec
NCT04795531 phase3completednot on this map

A 26-week Double Blinded, Multiregional, Trial Comparing the Effect and Safety of Once Weekly Insulin Icodec and Once Daily Insulin Degludec 100 Units/mL, Both in Combination With Non-insulin Anti-diabetic Drugs, in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2021 to 2022Enrolled588ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsInsulin icodec, Placebo insulin icodec, Insulin degludec, Placebo insulin degludec
NCT04880850 phase3completednot on this map

A 26-week Trial Comparing the Effect and Safety of Once Weekly Insulin Icodec and Once Daily Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL, Both in Combination With Bolus Insulin With or Without Non-insulin Anti-diabetic Drugs, in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes on a Basal-bolus Regimen

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovo Nordisk A/SRan2021 to 2022Enrolled582ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsInsulin icodec, Insulin glargine, Insulin aspart
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael C RiddellMuscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada. mriddell@yorku.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6556-7559
Simon HellerDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-9565
Lisbeth CarstensenNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-633X
Thaís M Pagliaro RochaNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0113-6877
Sara Kehlet WattNovo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-1678
Vincent C WooSection of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1745-6381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisPhysical activity increases the risk of hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes when basal or basal-bolus insulin therapy is administered. Once-weekly basal insulins may elevate the risk of physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemia compared with other basal insulins because the administered levels cannot be reduced in anticipation of increased physical activity. This post hoc analysis of five separate randomised trials (ONWARDS 1-5) aimed to examine physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episodes in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving either once-weekly basal insulin icodec (herein referred to as 'icodec') or once-daily basal insulins.

methodsThe ONWARDS 1-5 Phase 3a randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly basal icodec vs once-daily basal insulin in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants self-monitored their blood glucose levels using a blood glucose meter and a digital diary. In each trial, suspected hypoglycaemia symptoms triggered additional self-measured blood glucose readings, and values indicative of hypoglycaemia were recorded in the participants' digital diary. Participants who experienced hypoglycaemic episodes were instructed to note any relation of each episode to physical activity. Hypoglycaemic episodes were classified as alert value (level 1: blood glucose <3.9 but ≥3.0 mmol/l), clinically significant (level 2: blood glucose <3.0 mmol/l) or severe (level 3: cognitive impairment requiring external assistance). The proportions of hypoglycaemic episodes that were attributed to physical activity and the ORs of having a physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episode were calculated for the two basal insulin types (once-weekly vs once-daily) for each of the five trials.

resultsAcross all trials, there were no consistent differences between icodec and the once-daily insulin comparators in the proportions of hypoglycaemic episodes that were attributed to physical activity; these episodes were mainly alert value or clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes. In both insulin-naive and insulin-experienced participants, the incidence of physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes was consistently ≤3.0% in ONWARDS 1, 2, 3 and 5. In ONWARDS 4, the incidence of physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episodes was numerically higher in both treatment groups (18.6% [icodec] vs 17.9% [insulin glargine U100]), which was expected given the basal-bolus insulin regimen. Across all trials, there were no statistically significant differences in the odds of experiencing a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode with icodec vs once-daily insulin comparators. The frequency of recurrent clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes in the 24 h after a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode was low, with no such episodes in ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5. In contrast, in ONWARDS 2 and 4, the frequency of recurrent clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes in the 24 h after a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode was numerically higher with icodec vs the once-daily insulin comparators, whilst no additional severe episodes were reported in any participants across the trials. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThese findings do not suggest that there is an additional increase in hypoglycaemia risk attributed to physical activity with once-weekly basal icodec vs once-daily basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04460885 (ONWARDS 1), NCT04770532 (ONWARDS 2), NCT04795531 (ONWARDS 3), NCT04880850 (ONWARDS 4) and NCT04760626 (ONWARDS 5).

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinAdultAgedBlood GlucoseDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinExerciseHypoglycaemiaInsulin icodecOnce-weekly basal insulinPhysical activityType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40186685
PMCPMC12176998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.