Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186652›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2025

Deep learning-based denoising image reconstruction of body magnetic resonance imaging in children.

Vanda Pocepcova, Michael Zellner, Fraser Callaghan, Xinzeng Wang, Maelene Lohezic, Julia Geiger, Christian Johannes Kellenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vanda PocepcovaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Lenggstrasse 30, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. Vanda.Pocepcova@kispi.uzh.ch.ORCID 0009-0008-1546-2837
Michael ZellnerDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Lenggstrasse 30, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9118-7266
Fraser CallaghanChildren's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2862-6633
Xinzeng WangGE Healthcare, Houston, TX, USA.
Maelene LohezicGE Healthcare, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0007-4326-4005
Julia GeigerDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Lenggstrasse 30, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian Johannes KellenbergerDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Lenggstrasse 30, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9122-2431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadial k-space sampling is widely employed in paediatric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to mitigate motion and aliasing artefacts. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based image reconstruction has been developed to enhance image quality and accelerate acquisition time.

objectiveTo assess image quality of deep learning (DL)-based denoising image reconstruction of body MRI in children. MATERIALS AND

methodsChildren who underwent thoraco-abdominal MRI employing radial k-space filling technique (PROPELLER) with conventional and DL-based image reconstruction between April 2022 and January 2023 were eligible for this retrospective study. Only cases with previous MRI including comparable PROPELLER sequences with conventional image reconstruction were selected. Image quality was compared between DL-reconstructed axial T1-weighted and T2-weighted images and conventionally reconstructed images from the same PROPELLER acquisition. Quantitative image quality was assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the liver and spleen. Qualitative image quality was evaluated by three observers using a 4-point Likert scale and included presence of noise, motion artefact, depiction of peripheral lung vessels and subsegmental bronchi at the lung bases, sharpness of abdominal organ borders, and visibility of liver and spleen vessels. Image quality was compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Scan time length was compared to prior MRI obtained with conventional image reconstruction.

resultsIn 21 children (median age 7 years, range 1.5 years to 15.8 years) included, the SNR and CNR of the liver and spleen on T1-weighted and T2-weighted images were significantly higher with DL-reconstruction (P<0.001) than with conventional reconstruction. The DL-reconstructed images showed higher overall image quality, with improved delineation of the peripheral vessels and the subsegmental bronchi in the lung bases, sharper abdominal organ margins and increased visibility of the peripheral vessels in the liver and spleen. Not respiratory-gated DL-reconstructed T1-weighted images demonstrated more pronounced respiratory motion artefacts in comparison to conventional reconstruction (P=0.015), while there was no difference for the respiratory-gated T2-weighted images. The median scan time per slice was reduced from 6.3 s (interquartile range, 4.2 - 7.0 s) to 4.8 s (interquartile range, 4.4 - 4.9 s) for the T1-weighted images and from 5.6 s (interquartile range, 5.4 - 5.9 s) to 4.2 s (interquartile range, 3.9 - 4.8 s) for the T2-weighted images.

conclusionDL-based denoising image reconstruction of paediatric body MRI sequences employing radial k-space sampling allowed for improved overall image quality at shorter scan times. Respiratory motion artefacts were more pronounced on ungated T1-weighted images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAbdomenAdolescentArtifactsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLiverMaleRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioDeep learningImage reconstructionLungMagnetic resonance imagingPaediatricUpper abdomen

Identifiers

PMID40186652
PMCPMC12119730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.