ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Construction of a computational model of individual progression of motion sickness symptoms based on subjective vertical conflict theory.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Theoretical considerations on models of vestibular self-motion perception as inherent in computational frameworks of motion sickness.Biological cybernetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models predicting motion sickness have advanced, particularly those based on subjective vertical conflict (SVC) theory. While SVC-based models primarily predict motion sickness incidence (MSI), which is defined as the percentage of people who would vomit under a given motion, models predicting milder individual symptoms, which are crucial for daily applications, are still required. Recently, computational models predicting vestibular motion-sickness progression using the SVC theory have been developed by changing the output of a 6DOF-SVC model from MSI to the Misery Scale (MISC), a subjective measure of symptom progression. In practical applications, the ability to predict MISC for unseen motions is crucial. The present study conceived a method for predicting MISC beyond a certain point in the future by identifying parameters from data collected up to that point. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of the number of data points used for parameter identification on the future prediction accuracy. Observed MISC responses from participants exposed to linear lateral motion in darkness were used for model validation. The results indicated that prediction accuracy increased as more data points were included. On average, using more than 5-10 min of data significantly increased the accuracy compared to a model using averaged parameter sets across participants, although the tendency significantly differed based on an individual's MISC history. A trial considering individual MISC histories, in which data points were defined when the observed MISC first reached certain levels, showed a general trend of improved accuracy when data up to MISC Level 3 was used. The findings of this study demonstrate that motion sickness symptom progression can be predicted with reduced error by incorporating individual symptom histories, thereby providing a foundation for the development of personalized motion sickness prediction models applicable to broader applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.