Observational studyCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
A Retrospective Observational Study on the Impact of Digital Strategies to Boost Cervical Screening Uptake in Primary Care.
Observational study in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Interventions in Primary Care to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionCervical cancer is largely preventable through regular screening, yet uptake in the UK remains below national targets, particularly among harder-to-reach groups. Despite national efforts, barriers such as fear, embarrassment, and low health literacy continue to hinder participation. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of delivering information and education regarding cervical screening (CS) to hard-to-reach populations, with the aim of increasing CS uptake in line with the national target of 80% coverage.MethodsUsing a multidisciplinary team approach, women who had previously missed screenings were identified through electronic records. Remote interventions, including educational videos delivered via email and SMS, and an online booking system, were implemented to provide accessible information and flexible appointment options. These interventions aimed to address common barriers and encourage informed participation.ResultsOver 3 months, screening rates increased significantly. Uptake among women aged 25-49 rose from 77% to 80.5%, while rates among women aged 50-64 improved from 81% to 97%.ConclusionThis study highlights the potential effectiveness of remote communication tools in increasing cervical screening participation, particularly among populations historically less likely to engage. Integrating digital resources into routine practice also has the potential to reduce administrative burdens, improve patient education, and make screening more accessible. By addressing key barriers and providing flexible booking options, primary care clinics can enhance screening uptake, supporting earlier cervical cancer detection and ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.