Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186619›Full record

Observational studyCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

A Retrospective Observational Study on the Impact of Digital Strategies to Boost Cervical Screening Uptake in Primary Care.

Lisa Haith, Carl Deaney, Danielle Reesby, Victoria Ellis, Georgia Cole, Victoria Scott, Alena Nicholson, Rachael Hemingway-Deaney

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa HaithMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.
Carl DeaneyMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2709-7960
Danielle ReesbyMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.
Victoria EllisMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.
Georgia ColeMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.
Victoria ScottMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.
Alena NicholsonMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.
Rachael Hemingway-DeaneyMarsh Medical Practice, Louth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionCervical cancer is largely preventable through regular screening, yet uptake in the UK remains below national targets, particularly among harder-to-reach groups. Despite national efforts, barriers such as fear, embarrassment, and low health literacy continue to hinder participation. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of delivering information and education regarding cervical screening (CS) to hard-to-reach populations, with the aim of increasing CS uptake in line with the national target of 80% coverage.MethodsUsing a multidisciplinary team approach, women who had previously missed screenings were identified through electronic records. Remote interventions, including educational videos delivered via email and SMS, and an online booking system, were implemented to provide accessible information and flexible appointment options. These interventions aimed to address common barriers and encourage informed participation.ResultsOver 3 months, screening rates increased significantly. Uptake among women aged 25-49 rose from 77% to 80.5%, while rates among women aged 50-64 improved from 81% to 97%.ConclusionThis study highlights the potential effectiveness of remote communication tools in increasing cervical screening participation, particularly among populations historically less likely to engage. Integrating digital resources into routine practice also has the potential to reduce administrative burdens, improve patient education, and make screening more accessible. By addressing key barriers and providing flexible booking options, primary care clinics can enhance screening uptake, supporting earlier cervical cancer detection and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesbarrierscervical cancercervical screeningdigital toolshealth literacyhealth outcomesPAP smearpatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID40186619
PMCPMC12032430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.