Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186596›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Open-source deep-learning models for segmentation of normal structures for prostatic and gynecological high-dose-rate brachytherapy: Comparison of architectures.

Andrew J Krupien, Yasin Abdulkadir, Dishane C Luximon, John Charters, Huiming Dong, Jonathan Pham, Dylan O'Connell, Jack Neylon, James M Lamb

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Systematic review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew J KrupienDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7524-5569
Yasin AbdulkadirDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dishane C LuximonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
John ChartersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7907-8748
Huiming DongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2695-4251
Jonathan PhamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dylan O'ConnellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0752-5825
Jack NeylonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3421-7481
James M LambDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of deep learning-based auto-contouring algorithms in various treatment planning services is increasingly common. There is a notable deficit of commercially or publicly available models trained on large or diverse datasets containing high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment scans, leading to poor performance on images that include HDR implants. PURPOSE: To implement and evaluate automatic organs-at-risk (OARs) segmentation models for use in prostatic-and-gynecological computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 1316 computed tomography (CT) scans and corresponding segmentation files from 1105 prostatic-or-gynecological HDR patients treated at our institution from 2017 to 2024 were used for model training. Data sources comprised six CT scanners including a mobile CT unit with previously reported susceptibility to image streaking artifacts. Two UNet-derived model architectures, UNet++ and nnU-Net, were investigated for bladder and rectum model training. The models were tested on 100 CT scans and clinically-used segmentation files from 62 prostatic-or-gynecological HDR brachytherapy patients, disjoint from the training set, collected in 2024. Performance was evaluated using the Dice-Similarity-Coefficient (DSC) between model predicted contours and clinically-used contours on slices in common with the Clinical-Target-Volume (CTV). Additionally, a blinded evaluation of ten random test cases was conducted by three experienced planners.

resultsMedian (interquartile range) 3D DSC on CTV-containing slices were 0.95 (0.04) and 0.87 (0.09) for the UNet++ bladder and rectum models, respectively, and 0.96 (0.03) and 0.88 (0.10) for the nnU-Net. The rank-sum test did not reveal statistically significant differences in these DSC (p = 0.15 and 0.27, respectively). The blinded evaluation scored trained models higher than clinically-used contours.

conclusionBoth UNet-derived architectures perform similarly on the bladder and rectum and are adequately accurate to reduce contouring time in a review-and-edit context during HDR brachytherapy planning. The UNet++ models were chosen for implementation at our institution due to lower computing hardware requirements and are in routine clinical use.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyDeep LearningGenital Neoplasms, FemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedOrgans at RiskProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleRadiotherapy DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedAuto‐contouringbrachytherapydice‐similarity‐coefficientsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40186596
PMCPMC12148797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.