Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186543›Full record

ReviewThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2025

Genome editing in the green alga Chlamydomonas: past, present practice and future prospects.

Adrian P Nievergelt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adrian P NievergeltMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstraße 108, Dresden, 01307, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-6318

Funding

European Molecular Biology Organization ALTF 891-2018Human Frontier Science Program LT000515/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The green alga Chlamydomonas is an important and versatile model organism for research topics ranging from photosynthesis and metabolism, cilia, and basal bodies to cellular communication and the cellular cycle and is of significant interest for green bioengineering processes. The genome in this unicellular green alga is contained in 17 haploid chromosomes and codes for 16 883 protein coding genes. Functional genomics, as well as biotechnological applications, rely on the ability to remove, add, and change these genes in a controlled and efficient manner. In this review, the history of gene editing in Chlamydomonas is put in the context of the wider developments in genetics to demonstrate how many of the key developments to engineer these algae follow the global trends and the availability of technology. Building on this background, an overview of the state of the art in Chlamydomonas engineering is given, focusing primarily on the practical aspects while giving examples of recent applications. Commonly encountered Chlamydomonas-specific challenges, recent developments, and community resources are presented, and finally, a comprehensive discussion on the emergence and evolution of CRISPR/Cas-based precision gene editing is given. An outline of possible future paths for gene editing based on current global trends in genetic engineering and tools for gene editing is presented.

Indexed as

ChlamydomonasGene EditingGenome, PlantCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic EngineeringChlamydomonasCRISPR/Casgene editinggenetics

Identifiers

PMID40186543
PMCPMC11971955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.