Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186515›Full record

ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2025

Incidence of complications from perioperative urinary catheterisation in horses.

C T Quinn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C T QuinnSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3039-2482

Funding

Charles Sturt University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheterisation of the urinary bladder is a common procedure during perioperative care of horses. Benefits of urinary catheters include a reduction in the risk of recovery-associated slip hazards as a consequence of voided urine and the measurement of urine output during anaesthesia. However, there is little information regarding the risks associated with this procedure. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken in horses admitted to a university teaching hospital for surgery during which a urinary catheter was placed perioperatively. Data were retrieved from clinical records including signalment, procedure type, presence of pre-existing urinary/renal pathology, timing of catheter placement, complications from catheterisation, injuries during recovery and total volume of urine. Records were searched for evidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) or urethral strictures at any time following catheterisation. Descriptive statistics were calculated for numerical data. A total of 218 horses were included. The majority of catheters (n = 157, 70.7%) were placed immediately prior to recovery. The median volume of urine collected during anaesthesia was 4.89 mL/kg (0.0-37.66 mL/kg). The duration of catheterisation ranged from less than 20 min to 4 days. Complications occurred in three horses (1.4%) where the catheter could not be passed through the urethra, resulting in minor urethral trauma in one case. No clinical signs of UTI or urethral stricture were reported in any horse post-catheterisation. Short-term placement of urinary catheters during the perioperative period has a low incidence of complications. Difficulty inserting the catheter is occasionally encountered and may result in urethral injury.

Indexed as

Horse DiseasesPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsUrinary CatheterizationAnimalsCohort StudiesFemaleHorsesIncidenceMaleRetrospective StudiesUrinary CathetersUrinary Tract Infectionsanaesthesiahorsesurinary cathetersurology

Identifiers

PMID40186515
PMCPMC12134836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.