ArticleInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
Construction and evaluation of glucocorticoid dose prediction model based on genetic and clinical characteristics of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, no glucocorticoid dose prediction model is available for clinical practice. This study aimed to utilise machine learning techniques to develop and validate personalised dosage models. Participants were patients with SLE who were registered at Nanfang Hospital and received prednisone. Univariate analysis was used to confirm the feature variables. Subsequently, the random forest (RF) algorithm was utilised to interpolate the absent values of the feature variables. Finally, we assessed the prediction capabilities of 11 machine learning and deep-learning algorithms (Logistic, SVM, RF, Adaboost, Bagging, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, MLP, and TabNet). Finally, a confusion matrix was used to validate the three regimens. In total, 129 patients met the inclusion criteria. The XGBoost algorithm was selected as the preferred method because of its superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.81. The factors exhibiting the highest correlation with the prednisone dose were CYP3A4 (rs4646437), albumin (ALB), haemoglobin (HGB), anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies (Anti-dsDNA), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), age, and HLA-DQA1 (rs2187668). Based on validation, the precision and recall rates for low-dose prednisone (⩾5 mg but <7.5 mg/d) were 100% and 40% respectively. Similarly, for medium-dose prednisone (⩾7.5 mg but <30 mg/d), the accuracy and recall rates were 88% and 88%, and for high-dose prednisone (⩾30 mg but ⩽100 mg/d), the accuracy and recall rates were 62% and 100% respectively. A robust machine learning model was developed to accurately predict prednisone dosage by integrating the identified genetic and clinical factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.