ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Health economic evaluation of implementing a universal immunization program with nirsevimab compared to standard of care for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in Canadian infants.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Clesrovimab for Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Infants in the United States.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Evaluating respiratory syncytial virus immunization strategies for infants in Canada: A cost-utility analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and clinical impact of pediatric RSV co-infections after the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a highly contagious pathogen and a leading cause of severe lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) in infants and young children, irrespective of risk factors. Nirsevimab, an extended half-life monoclonal antibody, was approved in Canada in 2023 as a passive immunizing agent for the prevention of RSV LRTI. This study evaluated the optimal price per dose (PPD) at commonly accepted willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds among Canadian infants compared to the current standard of care (i.e. palivizumab for preterm infants and those with specific medical conditions). A static decision tree model was developed to assess the impact of nirsevimab on RSV-related health and economic outcomes among Canadian infants - including outpatient physician and emergency department visits, inpatient hospitalizations including intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and mechanical ventilation, and the associated healthcare costs of these outcomes. The model utilized Canadian epidemiological and cost inputs where possible, adopting a societal perspective. Compared to the standard of care, nirsevimab was expected to prevent 47,609 RSV-related health events, including 2,296 hospitalizations and a reduction of approximately $45 million in direct healthcare costs. At a WTP threshold of $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), the estimated base case PPD was $536, based on average cost assumptions across several costing scenarios. These findings suggest that universal immunization with nirsevimab could significantly reduce the health and economic burden of RSV among Canadian Infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.