ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
Uptake rates for non-invasive prenatal screening for single-gene disorders associated with advanced paternal age.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Uptake rates for non-invasive prenatal screening for single-gene disorders associated with advanced paternal age.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to quantify uptake rates of non-invasive prenatal screening for de novo single-gene disorders (NIPS-SGD) in pregnant subjects whose reproductive partner is of advanced paternal age (APA) and to determine individual parameters associated with higher test uptake rates. A cross-sectional study was performed of pregnant subjects who received prenatal genetic counseling at a mid-size tertiary care center and were offered NIPS-SGD for APA (defined as 45 or older at delivery) between June 1, 2017 and April 13, 2021. We included non-anomalous, singleton gestations who conceived without donor egg/sperm. The outcome was measured as subjects who elected to do NIPS-SGD versus subjects who declined. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a model to discriminate between those who opted for testing and those who did not. 186 subjects were offered NIPS-SGD and met inclusion criteria. 70 had testing and 116 declined. Overall uptake rate was 38%. Several individual parameters were associated with higher test uptake including utilization of other screenings such as NIPS for aneuploidy (OR 3.4), carrier screening (OR 7.0) and invasive diagnostic testing (OR 8.4), presence of reproductive partner (OR 4.3), medicaid insurance (OR 2.6), and counseling at an offsite location (OR 2.0). AUC for the final regression model predicting NIPS-SGD uptake was 0.79. Based on this study, subjects who are information seekers and who opt for other prenatal screenings are more likely to pursue NIPS-SGD for de novo conditions associated with APA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.