Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186397›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Uptake rates for non-invasive prenatal screening for single-gene disorders associated with advanced paternal age.

Kylie Katz, Justin S Brandt, Gary Heiman, Laurie Simone, Shama Khan, Pranali Shingala, Elena Ashkinadze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kylie KatzDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1187-8535
Justin S BrandtDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Gary HeimanDepartment of Genetics and the Human Genetics Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Laurie SimoneHackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA.
Shama KhanDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Pranali ShingalaDepartment of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA.
Elena AshkinadzeDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to quantify uptake rates of non-invasive prenatal screening for de novo single-gene disorders (NIPS-SGD) in pregnant subjects whose reproductive partner is of advanced paternal age (APA) and to determine individual parameters associated with higher test uptake rates. A cross-sectional study was performed of pregnant subjects who received prenatal genetic counseling at a mid-size tertiary care center and were offered NIPS-SGD for APA (defined as 45 or older at delivery) between June 1, 2017 and April 13, 2021. We included non-anomalous, singleton gestations who conceived without donor egg/sperm. The outcome was measured as subjects who elected to do NIPS-SGD versus subjects who declined. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a model to discriminate between those who opted for testing and those who did not. 186 subjects were offered NIPS-SGD and met inclusion criteria. 70 had testing and 116 declined. Overall uptake rate was 38%. Several individual parameters were associated with higher test uptake including utilization of other screenings such as NIPS for aneuploidy (OR 3.4), carrier screening (OR 7.0) and invasive diagnostic testing (OR 8.4), presence of reproductive partner (OR 4.3), medicaid insurance (OR 2.6), and counseling at an offsite location (OR 2.0). AUC for the final regression model predicting NIPS-SGD uptake was 0.79. Based on this study, subjects who are information seekers and who opt for other prenatal screenings are more likely to pursue NIPS-SGD for de novo conditions associated with APA.

Indexed as

Noninvasive Prenatal TestingPaternal AgePrenatal DiagnosisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyadvanced paternal agegenetic counselinggenetic testingnon‐invasive prenatal screening for single‐gene disordersprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID40186397
PMCPMC11971587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.