ArticleClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2025
Incorporating Clinical Examination Skills Into a Preclinical Anatomy Course: A Method for Facilitating Engagement and Interest.
Article in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incorporating Clinical Examination Skills Into a Preclinical Anatomy Course: A Method for Facilitating Engagement and Interest.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anatomy instruction is enhanced when students are engaged and interested in course material, and the relevance of the subject matter to their academic success and professional careers is emphasized. We developed a learning activity for a pre-clinical anatomy course using the clinical skills of inspection and palpation of a cadaver donor to demonstrate the value of those skills in learning anatomy and to facilitate anatomical understanding in a format similar to that used in clinical practice. Students were instructed to inspect and palpate various anatomical structures and relationships on their donor cadavers to identify features that could help in recognizing potential abnormalities, understanding disease mechanisms, and learning the anatomical bases of certain medical interventions and surgical procedures. Using these techniques, a tumor mass involving the medial end of the clavicle was identified. Student interest was increased, which led to further study and subsequent pathological identification of the tumor as a rare osteochondroma. We found that the addition of inspection and palpation as methods for learning human anatomy in the dissection laboratory, methods not commonly used, facilitated both engagement and interest in a particular area of the subject. Students also developed a respect for their donors, viewing them as their first patients. In light of the diversity in lifestyles, medical conditions, and causes of death within donor populations, we believe the approach described here can contribute greatly to the value of human anatomy courses that use cadaver donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.