Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186315›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025

Psychosocial stress factors in families with preterm infants during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Alina Fendel, Tamara Fuschlberger, Anna Friedmann, Ina Nehring, Marcus Krüger, Volker Mall, Verena Kraus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alina FendelDivision of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Perinatal Centre, München Klinik Harlaching, Munich, Germany. alinafendel@gmx.de.
Tamara FuschlbergerTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Social Paediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anna FriedmannTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Social Paediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ina NehringTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Social Paediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marcus KrügerDivision of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Perinatal Centre, München Klinik Harlaching, Munich, Germany.
Volker MallTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Social Paediatrics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Verena KrausTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Social Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Neurology, Technical University of Munich, Germany, Germany. Verena.kraus@mri.tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Covid-19 pandemic restrictions severely impacted parents' and children's mental and physical health. Families with pre-existing stress factors may have been particularly affected. Parental stress following premature birth is well acknowledged. The addition of the pandemic restrictions to stressors related to premature birth may constitute an especially high-risk factor for family stress and thereby neuropsychological development. Accessibility to special preterm follow-up care programs is important for neuropsychological development and faced additional relevance in the face of pandemic related stressors. We studied the hypothesis that families with preterm born infants were particularly adversely affected by the pandemic-related restrictions in comparison to families with term born infants. Specific stress factors were explored as well as the accessibility of support programs.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, families were recruited in a neonatology unit with the highest level of care according to German regulations. A questionnaire on perceived pandemic stress factors including amongst others: social contacts, family support, intrafamilial conflicts, leisure activities, and family planning was completed by 101 parents of prematurely born infants while pandemic related restrictions were still in place. We distinguished preterm infants with low gestational age and birth weight from other preterm infants and term born infants. T-tests, Chi-Square tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and binary logistic regression analysis were applied to compare the subgroups.

resultsThe stress levels resulting from restricted social contacts, family conflicts and accessibility to family support services were significantly higher in families with term-born infants. The accessibility of targeted follow-up care programs for preterm infants was significantly lower for moderate and late preterm infants. The pandemic has had an influence on the decision of parents to have more children in both groups.

conclusionFamilies with preterm infants were less stressed by the pandemic than those with term infants. Targeted follow-up care focused on high-risk groups and left moderate and late preterm infants without medical check-ups. This reflects the general focus in society on high-risk populations during the pandemic. The pandemic had an influence on family planning in both groups.

Indexed as

Covid-19 pandemicFollow up carePandemic burdenPreterm infants

Identifiers

PMID40186315
PMCPMC11971739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.