Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2025
Short-term outcome following postoperative enhanced recovery implementation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06570018 (Short Term Outcome Following Post Operative Enhanced Recovery Implementation in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Short Term Outcome Following Post Operative Enhanced Recovery Implementation in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the short-term outcome following postoperative enhanced recovery implementation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
methodsQuasi-experimental research design was utilized. Thirty patients received postoperative enhanced recovery after open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer compared with control group who received routine care. Patient assessment sheet and gastrointestinal quality of life index were the tools used for data collection.
resultsThe mean age was 40.43 ± 8.39 years for the study group and 39.53 ± 8.08 for the control group (56.7%, 70%), respectively, were males. The study group demonstrated early first bowel movement, flatus and stool passage (8.1 ± 1.16 (h), 12.6 ± 2.46 (h), and 2.47 ± 0.82 (days)), respectively, compared to control group (10 ± 1.11, 15.1 ± 2.04, and 3.57 ± 0.82). A significant reduction (6.93 ± 1.29 vs. 12.3 ± 4.96 (days)) and (30% vs. 60%) in hospital length of stay and postoperative complications among study group compared to control group (P < 0.01). The mean scores (56.17 ± 13.78 and 72.6 ± 11.89 vs. 34.33 ± 8.91and 53.43 ± 16.14) of gastrointestinal quality of life index were significantly better in study group (P < 0.05).
conclusionImproved gastrointestinal functional recovery, reduced postoperative complications, and improved quality of life, all were a result of implementing postoperative enhanced recovery among patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Trial Registration Number (TRN) -URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . Unique identifier: NCT06570018 Date of registration July August 22, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.