ArticleBMC oral health2025
Management of crown fractures with different pulp treatments and Re-attachment technique: case series.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fracture Resistance of Reattached Tooth Fragments: Influence of Adhesive Curing Mode and Composite Viscosity.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- In-Depth Analysis of AG73-Dental Pulp Cell Interactions Underlying Adhesion and Mineralization: Insights from Alanine Scanning.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes and risk factors of pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth with complicated crown fractures: A 12-60-month prospective clinical study.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCrown fracture is a type of traumatic injury that mostly affects the maxillary incisors. Depending on the involvement of the pulp, crown fracture may occur as complicated or uncomplicated and constitutes 26-76% of dental injuries in the permanent teeth. The effective treatment of crown fractures should aim to gain optimal aesthetics and function by preserving the vitality of the tooth. There have been case reports in the literature regarding pulpotomy and reattachment techniques in traumatized teeth. However, there has been no case series presenting different endodontic treatments performed with different current materials along with the reattachment technique. The aim of the current case series is to present treatment approaches of 3 crown fracture cases with different pulp treatments and re-attachment technique. CASE PRESENTATION: In all cases the patients were 8 years old boys. In the first and third cases, complicated crown fractures involved upper central incisors. After endodontic treatment with Cvek pulpotomy, the teeth were restored using Biodentine in case 1 and MTA in case 3. In the second case, uncomplicated crown fracture of the lower central incisor was treated with indirect pulp capping. In all cases, the fractured crown parts were re-attached and the patients were scheduled for recall appointments.
conclusionsRe-attachment technique offers aesthetic, functional and economic treatment option by long-term preserving the anatomic form, color and surface texture. The evaluation of the pulpal status before the reattachment technique and application of the proper pulpal treatment influences the prognosis of the tooth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.