Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186276›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025

Is the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure truly a sphincter preserving procedure for anal fistula? A scoping review of the literature.

Ian Jse-Wei Tan, Bei En Siew, Jerrald Lau, Carol Pei Ling Yap, Stephanie Marie May Ee Soon, Ker-Kan Tan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tractWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ian Jse-Wei TanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. ian_jw_tan@nuhs.edu.sg.
Bei En SiewDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jerrald LauDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Carol Pei Ling YapDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Stephanie Marie May Ee SoonDivision of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Ker-Kan TanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure has garnered popularity with its success rates and purported sphincter-continence preservation. However, there remains a paucity in the literature on the objective evaluation of sphincter integrity and fecal continence after the LIFT procedure.

objectivesThe present study undertakes a scoping review to systematically explore and map the published literature, to evaluate the sufficiency of data on the impact on continence in patients after the LIFT procedure.

designA systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASe, CINAHL was performed from January 2007 to April 2020 and 597 publications were identified. Forty-two satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We performed a scoping review in accordance to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

resultsOnly 3 (7.1%) of publications were randomized controlled trials, of which just 1 (2.4%) measured incontinence as a primary outcome. Continence was measured both pre- and post-LIFT in 30 (71.4%), of which 19 (45.2%) had a fixed protocol for continence assessment, which was heterogeneous between the studies. Continence was assessed using subjective scoring systems in 27 (64.3%) and objective measurement was performed in just 6 (14.3%). No studies performed post-operative anatomical assessment of the anal sphincter complex.

conclusionsLong-term continence in post-LIFT patients is not supported with adequately powered prospective longitudinal trials using rigorously protocoled pre- and post-operative assessment of continence. Future research that focuses on a combination of objective assessment using anal manometry as well as anatomical assessment of the sphincter complex on top of subjective evaluation is needed before we can be certain if LIFT is indeed a sphincter and continence preserving technique.

Indexed as

Anal CanalRectal FistulaFecal IncontinenceHumansLigationTreatment OutcomeAnal fistulaColorectalIncontinence

Identifiers

PMID40186276
PMCPMC11971777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.