Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40186268›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Gene expression analysis in circulating tumour cells to determine resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients.

Miriam González-Conde, Celso Yáñez, Carmen Abuín, Corinna Keup, Ramón Lago-Lestón, Maribel Aybar, Lucía Pedrouzo, Patricia Palacios, Teresa Curiel, Juan Cueva and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Miriam González-CondeTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Celso YáñezTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carmen AbuínTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Corinna KeupDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Ramón Lago-LestónTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Maribel AybarTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Lucía PedrouzoTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Patricia PalaciosDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Teresa CurielDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Juan CuevaDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carmela RodríguezDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Marta CarmonaDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Alexandra CortegosoDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Tomás García-CaballeroDepartment of Morphological Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela. Health Research Institute of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Laura Muinelo-RomayTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Sabine Kasimir-BauerDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Rafael López-LópezTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. rafael.lopez.lopez@sergas.es.
Clotilde CostaTranslational Medical Oncology Group, Oncomet, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. clotilde.costa.nogueira@sergas.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7327-2259

Funding

Axencia Galega de Innovación IN853B 2018/03Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer INVES211437COSTInstituto de Salud Carlos III FI19/00140Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/00183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic breast cancer (BC) is the main cause of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide. HR + /HER2- BC patients are treated with endocrine therapy (ET), but therapeutic resistance is common. The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with ET was approved for metastatic BC patients and extended the median progression-free survival to 24 months. This therapy is not always effective, and in every patient, resistance ultimately occurs, but the underlying resistance mechanisms remain unclear. To address this gap, we explored circulating tumour cells (CTCs) as biomarkers to assess treatment response and resistance in metastatic HR + /HER2- BC patients receiving CDK4/6i plus ET.

methodsIn total, 53 HR + /HER2- metastatic BC patients who received a CDK4/6i plus ET as first-line treatment were analysed, including samples from internal and external validation cohorts. CTCs were isolated using the negative enrichment approach RosetteSep (STEMCELL Technologies) or positive immunomagnetic selection targeting EpCAM, EGFR, and HER2 (AdnaTest EMT-2/StemCell Select™, QIAGEN). RNA was extracted from CTCs and PBMCs for nCounter analysis (Pancancer pathways panel) in a discovery phase. Subsequent validation was performed by RT-qPCR.

resultsCTC gene expression analysis revealed that non responder patients (those who experienced disease progression before 180 days) exhibited elevated PRKCB (p-value: 0.011), MAPK3 (p-value: 0.006) and STAT3 (p-value: 0.008) expression, while responders showed increased CDK6 (p-value: 0.011) and CCND1 (p-value: 0.035) expression at baseline. CTC transcriptional characterization revealed a gene expression signature (STAT3

conclusionsCTC gene expression provides information about treatment outcomes in HR + /HER2- metastatic BC patients receiving CDK4/6i plus ET and could guide personalized strategies and improve prognosis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Drug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAdultAgedFemaleHumansAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiomarkerBreast cancerCDK4/6 inhibitorsCirculating Tumour cellsSTAT3

Identifiers

PMID40186268
PMCPMC11971781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.