ArticleBMC medical education2025
Production and educational value of anatomical megamoulages.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Presence and Nature of AI-Use Disclosure Statements in Medical Education Journals: A Bibliometric Study.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnatomy is a crucial aspect of biological sciences and medical education, playing a pivotal role in various clinical practices. To enhance the existing curriculum and improve students' spatial understanding of anatomy, educators have explored the use of moulages. In a groundbreaking study conducted in 2022-2023, the effectiveness of megamoulages in enhancing the comprehensive understanding of anatomy among medical students at Gonabad and Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences was thoroughly assessed. The produced megamoulages are not simply larger than conventional moulages; rather, they present anatomical details more clearly, including maximum anatomical points, structures, and neuro-vascular relationships as described in reference books and articles, which were not adequately represented in previous models, and they are also hand-painted.
methodsThe production of megamoulages involved a comprehensive 20-month sequential process. Initially, a needs assessment questionnaire was administered to medical students, residents, medical faculty surgeons, and anatomists to evaluate the project's feasibility and significance. Results revealed that the majority of respondents (88%) believed the production of megamoulages would facilitate anatomy education. Anatomical models were strategically selected based on their complexity and the unavailability of similar models from foreign companies. Megamoulages (two groups of megamoulages: the first includes unique models, such as a sectional megamoulage of the brainstem that displays all structures in detail, while the second group (cerebellum and mandible) as improved quality models, which are similar to existing ones) were designed using 3D software, printed in sections, and assembled with magnets. The completed moulages were subjected to thorough evaluations following Kirkpatrick's model, which included methods such as smile sheets and scientific tests administered to randomly divided third-semester medical students in the mentioned universities.
resultsIn both universities, student satisfaction with the use of megamoulages was significantly higher compared to conventional moulages (P < 0.05). Additionally, in a written test, students who utilized megamoulages achieved an average score that was about 2.73 points higher than those who used conventional moulages (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe implementation of megamoulages significantly enhanced the scores of anatomy learners. This study underscores the importance of innovative teaching tools, such as megamoulages, in improving anatomical education and increasing student satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.